Open Access

The impact of headache and chronic musculoskeletal complaints on the risk of insomnia: longitudinal data from the Nord-Trøndelag health study

  • Siv Steinsmo Ødegård1Email author,
  • Trond Sand1,
  • Morten Engstrøm1,
  • John-Anker Zwart3 and
  • Knut Hagen1, 2
The Journal of Headache and Pain201314:24

DOI: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-24

Received: 4 January 2013

Accepted: 6 March 2013

Published: 12 March 2013

Abstract

Background

A strong relationship between insomnia and painful disorders has been found, but it is still unclear whether chronic pain leads to insomnia. There is a need of large-scale prospective studies to evaluate if there is a causal relationship between painful disorders and insomnia.

Methods

All inhabitants aged ≥ 20 years in Nord-Trøndelag County of Norway were invited to participate in two surveys (n = 92,566 and 93,860, respectively). 27,185 subjects participated in both surveys, and 19,271 of these were insomnia-free at baseline (population at risk). Using logistic regression, we evaluated the influence of headache, CMSCs and coexisting headache and CMSCs on the subsequent risk of insomnia.

Results

Compared to subjects without headache and CMSCs, there was an increased risk of insomnia among those with headache, most pronounced among those with headache ≥ 7 days / month (OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.9 – 2.6). Similarly, an increased risk among those with CMSCs was found, most evident for those with widespread CMSCs (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.8 – 2.2). Having coexistent CMSCs and headache (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.8 – 2.2) predisposed more strongly to insomnia than having headache (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.3 – 1.6) and CMSCs (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.4 – 1.7) alone.

Conclusion

In this prospective study headache and CMSCs were risk factors for insomnia 11 years later.

Keywords

Prospective Headache Chronic musculoskeletal complaints Risk factor Insomnia

Background

Insomnia is associated with considerable suffering for the affected individual [1] with additional impact on the society at large [2]. A strong relationship between insomnia and painful disorders have been reported [3], and studies indicate that pain not only might be a risk factor for insomnia but that the two disorders reciprocal influence and exacerbate each other [3]. It is also likely that when insomnia and chronic pain occur together their consequences are even more devastating [4]. In clinical studies acute painful stimuli applied to healthy subjects during sleep resulted in transient arousals [5], while chronic pain patients had poorer sleep than controls in terms of sleep latency, sleep efficiency and awakenings after sleep onset [6].

Although there is a well known association between insomnia and painful disorders it is still unclear whether chronic pain leads to insomnia [3]. The few longitudinal studies that do exist on this topic [710] include relatively few participants or lack validated diagnostic criteria of insomnia. The only study that included subjects free of sleep disturbance (n = 437) at baseline, reported that unspecified bodily pain was a risk factor for new-onset insomnia at follow-up one year later [8]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no large follow-up study has evaluated the influence of primary headaches and chronic musculoskeletal complaints (CMSCs) on the risk of insomnia.

In the present study we have studied this topic in a prospective cohort study, using data from two large-scale health surveys carried out in Nord-Trøndelag county of Norway in 1995–1997 and 2006–2008. The main objective was to evaluate the association between primary headaches, CMSCs and coexisting headache and CMSCs at baseline and the subsequent risk of insomnia among men and women at follow-up 11 years later.

Methods

The population

Nord-Trøndelag is one of 19 counties in Norway, and its geography and demography is fairly representative for the country [11]. The Nord-Trøndelag Health Survey (“Helseundersøkelsen i Nord-Trøndelag”: HUNT) is a longitudinal cohort study in which all inhabitants ≥20 years old of Nord-Trøndelag have been invited to participate.

The HUNT 2 study

In HUNT 2 (performed between August 1995 and June 1997) each person completed extensive questionnaires eliciting information on health problems. Among a wide range of topics in the first questionnaire (Q1) were education, physical activity, smoking, alcohol, and anxiety and depression (measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)) [12]. Details of the phrasing of these questions have been described previously [1317]. In the present paper, educational level was categorized according to duration (< 13 years vs. ≥ 13 years), work-status as paid work (yes vs. no), and sick leave duration the last 12 months, categorized as 0 weeks, < 2 weeks or ≥ 2 weeks. Cigarette smoking was categorized as current daily smoking (yes vs. no). Reponses to questions on physical activity were categorized according to duration and intensity of exercise per week with the extremes ≥ 3 hours hard physical activity and physical inactivity. Caffeine consumption was subdivided into two groups (highest quartile vs. other quartiles). Alcohol consumption was measured by the CAGE questionnaire [18], using a cutoff ≥ 1 to indicate possible alcohol abuse. Subjects suffering from gastrointestinal (GI) complaints (yes vs. no) were defined as subjects with some or much reflux symptoms and/ or diarrhea and /or constipation and / or nausea. In Q2 participants were asked if they had used medication (for any condition of any type) daily or almost daily during the last 12 months. In the following question they were asked for how many months they had taken specified drugs, including antidepressants, sedatives and hypnotics. We categorized the use of drugs as 0 months vs. ≥ 1 months. They were specifically asked how often, during the last month, they had used sedatives or hypnotics. This question was among those used to define the insomnia-free population in HUNT 2.

Headache diagnoses

Q2 included 13 questions about headache. All participants were asked the screening question “Have you suffered from headache during the last year?” Subjects answering “yes” were then asked to respond to the other headache-related questions, mainly designed to determine whether subjects met the migraine criteria of the International Headache Society (IHS) [19]. HUNT 2 did not include any question about pain intensity, and criterion C of the migraine diagnosis had to be modified accordingly [11]. Headache not fulfilling the migraine criteria were classified as non-migraineous headache. Headache was defined as frequent if it occurred > 7 days / month. The validity of the questionnaire based headache diagnoses in HUNT 2 has been evaluated previously [11]: For migraine, the sensitivity was 69% and specificity 89% (kappa value 0.59, 95% CI =0.47-0.71); for non-migraineous headache, the sensitivity was 61%, specificity 81% (kappa 0.43, 95% CI=0.29-0.57), and for headache > 7 days/month the sensitivity was 56% and specificity was 91% (kappa 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.66).

Chronic musculoskeletal complaints (CMSCs)

In Q1, subjects were asked the screening question: “Have you during the last year continuously for at least 3 months had pain and/or stiffness in muscles and joints?” The reliability of this question has been reported previously [20] and the chance-adjusted agreement (kappa value) was 0.63 (95% CI = 0.53-0.73).

Subjects who answered “yes” were also asked to mark the localization of this pain (neck, shoulders, elbows, wrist/hands, upper back, lower back, hips, knees, and/or ankles/feet). The nine anatomical regions were derived from the Nordic Questionnaire [21] evaluated previously and found to give reliable information for low back, upper limb and neck on the presence of symptoms during the past year [22].

Subjects who answered “yes” to the screening question were considered to have CMSCs. Widespread CMSCs were defined according to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ARC) as CMSCs from all of the following three regions: axial skeleton (neck, upper back, or lower back), above the waist (neck, shoulders, elbows, wrist/hands, or upper back) and below the waist (lower back, hips, knees, or ankles/feet) [23]. In HUNT 2 participants were not asked to distinguish between pain in the left and right side of the body. The change-adjusted agreement (kappa value) for widespread CMSCs has recently been estimated to 0.48 (95% CI = 0.38-0.64) [20]. Subjects with CMSCs who did not meet the criteria for widespread CMSCs were defined as non-widespread CMSCs.

The definition of insomnia-free in HUNT 2

In Q2, subjects were asked two questions about the frequency of sleep onset insomnia (“Have you had problems falling to sleep in the last month?”) and sleep maintenance problems (“During the last month, did you ever wake up too early, not being able to fall asleep again?”). There were four possible responses: 0 = never, 1 = occasionally, 2 = often, or 3 = almost every night. These two insomnia symptoms were dichotomized into: 0 = “no” (never / occasionally) or 1 = “yes” (often / almost every night). These two answer scores were added, and subjects with a sum score of 0 were considered unlikely to have insomnia [2426]. In the present study insomnia-free was defined as those who had a sum score of 0 on the two insomnia questions and had never used hypnotics or s edatives the last month.

The HUNT 3 study

HUNT 3 (performed between October 2006 and June 2008) was to a large extent a replication of HUNT 2.

Insomnia diagnosis

HUNT 3 included three insomnia questions in Q2: “How often during the last three months have you experienced: 1) difficulty falling asleep at night, 2) several awakenings during the night and 3) wake up to early and were not able to fall asleep again. The response alternatives were: 0 = never or seldom, 1 = sometimes, 2 = several times a week. The reliability of these three insomnia questions in HUNT 3 has been assessed previously, and found to be moderate with kappa-values of 0.44 (95% CI = 0.35 – 0.52) and 0.38 (95% CI = 0.31 – 0.46) and 0.35 (95% CI = 0.26 – 0.46) respectively [27]. To create a DSM-IV based proxy insomnia [24] diagnosis the three questions were first dichotomized into two possible responses: 0 = “no” (never, seldom or sometimes) and 1 = “yes” (several times a week). The insomnia questions were then added, and subjects with a score ≥ 1 were considered likely to have insomnia.

Headache

The Q2 also included the same headache-screening question that was used in HUNT 2. For the questionnaire-based status as a headache sufferer, a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 86%, and a kappa value of 0.70 have been found [28].

Study population

In HUNT 2, 65, 237 (69.5%) of 92,566 invited individuals answered Q1, and 50,738 (54.8%) answered the insomnia questions in Q2 and were classifiable according to pain status. Details of non-responders have been described previously [29]. In HUNT 3, 50,807 (54.1%) of the 93,860 invited adults answered Q1, and 40,534 (43.2%) completed the insomnia questions in Q2.

Among the 65,237 participants in HUNT 2, 10,507 had died, 240 had emigrated and 1 had disappeared by the time of HUNT 3. Out of all the 54,789 eligible HUNT 2 participants, 69% of men and 72% of women also participated in HUNT 3. The mean time of follow-up between HUNT 2 and HUNT 3 was 11 (range 9–13) years. Among the 50,738 who answered the insomnia in HUNT 2, 26,151 answered the insomnia related questions in both surveys. Of these 19,271 (74%) were considered free of insomnia in HUNT 2 (sum score of 0 on the proxy insomnia diagnosis and did not report any use of sleep medication or sedatives) and were defined as the population at risk. The remaining 6,880 had insomnia-symptoms at baseline in HUNT 2. The flow chart of participants in HUNT 2 and HUNT 3 is shown in Figure 1.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1129-2377-14-24/MediaObjects/10194_2013_Article_270_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

The flow of participants in HUNT 2 and HUNT 3.

Ethics

The study was approved by the Regional Committee for Ethics in Medical Research.

Statistics

In the population at risk, we used multivariate logistic regression (with 95% confidence intervals [CI]) to evaluate the relative influence of headache, CMSCs (alone or in combination with each other) in HUNT 2 on the risk of insomnia at follow-up. Comparisons were done between men and women to detect possible gender differences. To evaluate the probability of a linear relationship between headache frequency at baseline and insomnia at follow up, we performed trend analyses by treating frequency of headache (three categories) as a single ordinal variable. The trend test was considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

In the multivariate analyses we initially adjusted for age and gender. In a second set of analyses additional adjustments were done for previously identified potential confounding factors [2, 10, 1316, 29], in particular education level, work-status, sick leave, level of physical activity, daily use of tobacco, alcohol overuse, high coffee-consumption, anxiety and depression, antidepressants, GI-complaints, body mass index (BMI) and systolic blood pressure (BP). The variables were categorized as described in the method section (age, BMI and systolic BP as continuous variables), and included in the statistical model one at a time. Potential confounders were excluded in the final analyses if the OR changed less than 0.1 in analyses regarding headache and CMSCs respectively. Subjects with incomplete data regarding one or several variables were included in the analysis (as a “missing category”) to reduce the impact of possible bias.

In supplementary adjusted analyses, we evaluated the influence of headache status in HUNT 2 and HUNT 3 on the odds of having insomnia in HUNT 3.

The statistical analyses were performed with the Predictive Analytics Software (PASW), Statistics version 17.0 by Inc., an IBM Company (Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the population at risk (n=19,271) are given in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the population at risk 1 in HUNT-2

Variables

 

Number of participants

19,271

Age (mean [SD], missing = 0)

45.8 [12.7]

Gender (% women, missing = 0)

54.7

Married (%, missing = 12)

69.4

Education ≥ 13 years (%, missing = 275)

35.6

Paid work (%, missing = 167)

73.6

High level of physical activity2 (%, missing = 4150)

9.7

BMI (mean [SD], missing = 35)

26.0 [3.8]

Systolic BP (mean [SD], missing = 46)

133.3 [18.4]

Daily use of tobacco (%, missing = 1857)

27.2

Alcohol overuse (cage score ≥ 1) (%, missing = 2287)

16.2

Total HADS-score (mean [SD], missing = 1978)

6.6 [4.7]

GI-complaints3 (%, missing 517)

48.5

1: Population at risk = Insomnia-free subjects (defined as subjects who have never or occasionally had sleep onset or terminal insomnia during the last month, and do not use sleep medication) in HUNT-2 who answered the questions about headache and musculoskeletal complaints.

2: High level of physical activity = Strenuous physical activity ≥ 3 hours / week.

3: GI-complaints: Some or much reflux symptoms and/ or diarrhea and /or constipation and / or nausea.

Headache

In the multivariate analysis, adjusting for age and sex, GI-complaints and total HADS score, headache at baseline was associated with a 2-fold risk of insomnia (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.6 – 1.9) compared to subjects without headache and CMSCs. Compared to subjects without headache and CMSCs those with headache < 7 days / month had a 70% increased risk, while those with headache ≥ 7 days had a 120% increased for insomnia (Table 2). There was a significant relationship (p trend <0.001) between the headache frequency at baseline and the risk of insomnia 11 years later (Table 2). There were no significant differences between headache types or gender (Table 2).
Table 2

Influence of headache (related to type and frequency) on the risk of insomnia in HUNT-3 among the population at risk (n = 19,271)

   

Both gender 1

 

Women 2

 

Men 2

   

Insomnia 3

 

Insomnia 3

 

Insomnia 3

 

n, total = 14,639

n = 3069

OR (95% CI)

n = 2020

OR (95% CI)

n = 1049

OR (95% CI)

No headache or CMSCs

7263

1080

1.0 (ref)

581

1.0 (ref)

499

1.0 (ref)

Headache4

7376

1989

1.7 (1.6 – 1.9)

1439

1.8 (1.6 – 2.0)

550

1.7 (1.4 – 1.9)

< 7 days / month

6202

1589

1.7 (1.5 – 1.8)

1142

1.7 (1.5 – 1.9)

447

1.6 (1.4 – 1.8)

≥ 7 days / month

1174

400

2.2 (1.9 – 2.6)

297

2.2 (1.8 – 2.7)

103

2.2 (1.7 – 2.8)

p-trend

  

<0.001

 

<0.001

 

<0.001

Non migraineous headache

4963

1278

1.7 (1.5 – 1.8)

884

1.7 (1.5 – 1.9)

394

1.6 (1.4 – 1.9)

< 7 days / month

4279

1049

1.6 (1.4 – 1.8)

726

1.6 (1.4 – 1.8)

323

1.6 (1.3 – 1.8)

≥ 7 days / month

684

229

2.2 (1.8 – 2.7)

158

2.2 (1.7 – 2.8)

71

2.3 (1.6 – 3.1)

p-trend

  

<0.001

 

<0.001

 

<0.001

Migraine

2413

711

1.9 (1.7 – 2.1)

555

2.0 (1.7 – 2.3)

156

1.7 (1.4 – 2.1)

< 7 days / month

1923

540

1.8 (1.6 – 2.1)

416

1.9 (1.6 – 2.2)

124

1.6 (1.3 – 2.1)

≥ 7 days / month

490

171

2.2 (1.7 – 2.7)

139

2.2 (1.7 – 2.9)

32

2.0 (1.3 – 3.1)

p –trend

  

<0.001

 

<0.001

 

<0.001

1Data is adjusted for age, gender, anxiety, depression (total HADS-score) and GI-complaints.

2Data is adjusted for age, anxiety, depression (total HADS-score) and GI-complaints.

3: Insomnia = During the last three months difficulty falling asleep at night and / or several awakenings during the night and / or wake up to early and were not able to fall asleep again several days a week.

4: Headache = Subjects with headache only or headache and CMSCs combined.

Missing data: 155 subjects with pure headache (= 4.2%) and 182 subjects with coexisting headache and CMSCs (= 4.5%) did not answer the question on headache frequency.

Chronic musculoskeletal complaints

In age-, sex-, GI-complaints and total HADS score adjusted analyses, CMSCs at baseline was associated with a 2-fold risk of insomnia at follow-up (OR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.6 – 1.9) compared to subjects without headache and CMSCs. Compared to subjects without headache and CMSCs non-widespread CMSCs gave a 60% increased risk of insomnia, while a 100% increased risk was observed among those with widespread CMSCs (Table 3). There were no significant gender differences (Table 3).
Table 3

Influence of CMSC on the risk of insomnia in HUNT-3 among the population at risk (n = 19,271)

   

Both gender 1

 

Women 2

 

Men 2

   

Insomnia 3

 

Insomnia 3

 

Insomnia 3

 

n, total = 15,604

n = 3372

OR (95% CI)

n = 2025

OR (95% CI)

n = 1347

 

No headache or CMSCs

7263

1080

1.0 (ref)

581

1.0 (ref)

499

1.0 (ref)

CMSCs4

8341

2292

1.8 (1.6 – 1.9)

1444

1.9 (1.6 – 2.1)

848

1.7 (1.5 – 1.9)

Non widespread CMSC

4219

992

1.6 (1.4 – 1.7)

584

1.6 (1.4 – 1.9)

408

1.5 (1.3 – 1.8)

Widespread5 CMSC

4122

1300

2.0 (1.8 – 2.2)

860

2.1 (1.8 – 2.4)

440

1.9 (1.6 – 2.2)

1Data is adjusted for age, gender, anxiety, depression (total HADS-score) and GI-complaints.

2Data is adjusted for age, anxiety, depression (total HADS-score) and GI-complaints.

3: Insomnia = During the last three months difficulty falling asleep at night and / or several awakenings during the night and / or wake up to early and were not able to fall asleep again several days a week.

4,1: CMSCs is defined as the subjects who answered “yes” to the screening question: “Have you during the last year continuously for at least 3 months had pain and / or stiffness in muscles and joints?”

4,2: CMSCs = Subjects with CMSCs only or headache and CMSCs combined.

5: Widespread CMSCs = CMSCs from all of the following three regions: axial skeleton (neck, upper back, or lower back), above the waist (neck, shoulders, elbows, wrist/hands, or upper back) and below the waist (lower back, hips, knees, or ankles/feet).

Combined headache and chronic musculoskeletal complaints

Compared to subjects without headache and CMSCs, pure headache < 7 days / month at baseline gave a 40% increased risk of insomnia, while pure headache ≥ 7 days / month gave a 110% increased risk (Table 4). The combination of headache and CMSCs predisposed more strongly to insomnia than headache alone (Table 4). This effect was most prominent and significant (non-overlapping CIs) for headache <7 days / month with a 90% increased risk of insomnia compared to subjects free of headache and CMSCs at baseline (Table 4). Regarding subjects with headache ≥ 7 days / month having CMSCs did not have any strong influence the risk for insomnia (OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.9 – 2.7), compared to headache alone (overlapping CIs in Table 4).
Table 4

Risk of insomnia 1 at 11-year follow-up according to the combined effect of headache (related to type and frequency) and CMSCs 2 (yes/no)

  

Pure headache (no CMSCs)

 

Coexisting headache and CMSCs

  

Insomnia 1

  

Insomnia 1

 
 

total, n = 10,775

n = 1896

OR (95% CI)

total, n = 11,127

n = 2283

OR (95% CI)

No headache or CMSCs

7263

1080

1.0 (ref)

7263

1080

1.0 (ref)

Headache

3512

786

1.5 (1.3 – 1.6)

3864

1203

2.0 (1.8 – 2.2)*

< 7 days / month

3141

669

1.4 (1.2 – 1.6)

3061

920

1.9 (1.7 – 2.2)*

≥ 7 days / month

371

117

2.1 (1.7 – 2.7)

803

283

2.2 (1.9 – 2.7)

p-trend

  

<0.001

  

<0.001

Non migraineous headache

2437

512

1.4 (1.2 – 1.5)

2526

766

2.0 (1.7 – 2.2)*

< 7 days / month

2221

443

1.3 (1.1 – 1.5)

2058

606

1.9 (1.6 – 2.2)*

≥ 7 days / month

216

69

2.2 (1.6 – 3.0)

468

160

2.2 (1.8 – 2.8)

p-trend

  

<0.001

  

<0.001

Migraine

1075

274

1.7 (1.5 – 2.0)

1338

437

2.0 (1.7 – 2.3)

< 7 days / month

920

226

1.7 (1.4 – 2.0)

1003

314

1.9 (1.7 – 2.3)

≥ 7 days / month

155

48

2.1 (1.5 – 3.0)

335

123

2.2 (1.7 – 2.8)

p –trend

  

<0.001

  

<0.001

*Significant differences (non-overlapping CIs).

All data are adjusted for age, gender, anxiety, depression (total HADS-score) and GI-complaints.

1: Insomnia = During the last three months difficulty falling asleep at night and / or several awakenings during the night and / or wake up to early and were not able to fall asleep again several days a week.

2: CMSCs = Answered “yes” to the screening question: “Have you during the last year continuously for at least 3 months had pain and / or stiffness in muscles and joints?”

Missing data: 155 subjects with pure headache (= 4.2%) and 182 subjects with coexisting headache and CMSCs (= 4.5%) did not answer the question on headache frequency.

As shown in Table 5, compared to subjects without headache and CMSCs, the coexistence of headache ≥ 7 days / month and CMSCs had a stronger (significant) influence on the risk of insomnia (overall OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.9 – 2.6), than pure CMSCs (overall OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.4 – 1.7). This effect was evident for both non-widespread CMSCs and widespread CMSCs, but only significant for the former (Table 5).
Table 5

Risk of insomnia 1 at 11-year follow-up according to the combined effect of CMSCs 2 (non-widespread vs. widespread) and headache (yes/no)

  

Pure CMSCs (no headache)

 

CMSCs & headache < 7d / month

 

CMSCs & headache ≥7d / month

  

Insomnia 1

  

Insomnia 1

  

Insomnia 1

 
 

N, total = 11,558

N, total = 2109

OR (95% CI)

N, total = 10,324

N, total = 2000

OR (95% CI)

N, total = 8066

 

OR (95% CI)

No headache or CMSCs

7263

1080

1.0 (ref)

7263

1080

1.0 (ref)

7263

1080

1.0 (ref)

CMSCs2

4295

1029

1.6 (1.4 – 1.7)

3061

920

1.9 (1.7 – 2.2)

803

283

2.2 (1.9 – 2.6)*

Non-widespread CMSCs

2513

540

1.4 (1.3 – 1.6)

1357

339

1.6 (1.4 – 1.9)

262

86

2.2 (1.7 – 3.0)*

Widespread3 CMSCs

1782

489

1.8 (1.5 – 2.0)

1704

581

2.2 (1.9 – 2.5)

541

197

2.2 (1.8 – 2.7)

*Significant differences compared to pure CMSCs (no headache) (non-overlapping CIs).

All data are adjusted for age, gender, anxiety, depression (total HADS-score) and GI-complaints.

1: Insomnia = During the last three months difficulty falling asleep at night and / or several awakenings during the night and / or wake up to early and were not able to fall asleep again several days a week.

2: CMSCs = Have answered “yes” to the screening question: “Have you during the last year continuously for at least 3 months had pain and / or stiffness in muscles and joints?”

3: Widespread CMSCs = CMSCs from all of the following three regions: axial skeleton (neck, upper back, or lower back), above the waist (neck, shoulders, elbows, wrist/hands, or upper back) and below the waist (lower back, hips, knees, or ankles/feet).

Missing data: 155 subjects with pure headache (= 4.2%) and 182 subjects with coexisting headache and CMSCs (= 4.5%) did not answer the question on headache frequency.

Influence of headache status in HUNT 2 and HUNT 3

Individuals with headache in both surveys were more strongly associated to insomnia in HUNT 3 (OR=2.0; 95% CI 1.8-2.2) than those with headache in HUNT 3 only (OR=1.7, 95% CI 1.5-1.9) and those with headache in HUNT 2 only (OR=1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.4), using headache-free subjects in both surveys as a reference group.

Discussion

In this large-scale prospective study we found that headache and CMSCs increased the risk of insomnia at follow-up, most evident among those with headache ≥ 7 days/month, widespread CMSCs and the co-occurrence of headache and CMSCs at baseline.

Strengths of the present study include a well-defined population at risk without insomnia and the longitudinal design. In the large and unselected population we had data allowing separate analyses to evaluate the impact of pure headache as well as the coexistence of headache and CMSCs at baseline on the risk of insomnia. Furthermore, we had previously validated the questionnaire-based headache diagnoses [11], which have sensitivity estimates varying between 56% and 69% and a high specificity varying between 89% and 91%. We also found that the screening question for CMSCs had good reliability [20]. In addition, the present study was relatively well powered to detect gender differences. To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has included such a large number of other relevant health-related variables. This made it possible to adjust for several potential confounding variables including anxiety and depression [30]. Importantly, although we adjusted for anxiety and depression in the present paper, this does not rule out the possibility that these disorders are likely to play a major role in the development of insomnia in subjects with chronic painful conditions [3, 4]. Also, the possibility of residual confounding by unrecognized factors cannot be ruled out.

Some limitations should be considered. First, similar to other relevant prospective studies, the assessment of insomnia was questionnaire-based. Insomnia may, however, be present even in the absence of any objective measures for example by polysomnography [31]. Second, although the present proxy-insomnia diagnosis has been used successfully in several other studies [24, 25], it has not yet been validated and it does not fulfill the DSM-IV criteria for insomnia completely. Both surveys lacked sufficient information about daytime impairment that is required in the International Classification of Disease, ninth (ICD-9) and tenth (ICD-10) edition and the DSM-IV criteria. As described in the method-section, the HUNT 3 study did include one question regarding daytime sleepiness. However, there are conflicting results regarding the association between insomnia and subjective daytime sleepiness [32]. Further, as the daytime consequences vary between different insomnia subtypes [33], and even from person to person [34], it is unlikely that one question could capture all individuals with insomnia causing daytime impairment [34]. The insomnia diagnosis in HUNT 2 is also different from the DSM-IV criteria in another aspect, as the questionnaire did not include information about the insomnia symptoms beyond one month. While the ICD-9 and ICD-10 criteria have no requirement on the duration of the insomnia symptoms, it has to be present for more than one month according to the second version of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-2) [35] and the DSM-IV [36]. This makes our insomnia criteria less specific than the DSM-IV criteria, which might have influenced the results of the present study. In effort to make the diagnoses more specific we excluded subjects using hypnotics or sleep medication from the population at risk in HUNT 2, and based the diagnosis in HUNT 3 on three insomnia symptoms instead of two. Ideally the diagnoses would have been identical in HUNT 2 and HUNT 3, but unfortunately the insomnia questions in the two surveys differed a bit.

Third, although 62% of the subjects who answered the insomnia section of HUNT 2 also answered the insomnia section in HUNT 3, a selection bias cannot be ruled out. The participation rate was moderate at baseline (58%) and only 29% of the total population completed the insomnia section in both surveys. Despite this limitation, the HUNT studies include more than 200 health related variables, which will probably ensure that any remaining bias relevant to insomnia, headache and CMSCs is negligible.

Few previous longitudinal studies have evaluated the influence of headache and CMSCs on the risk of insomnia, and no large population-based follow-up study of adults has similar objectives and study design. In line with the present results, there is one study of 437 participants [8] that reported that unspecified bodily pain was a risk factor for new-onset insomnia at follow-up 1 year later. Furthermore, longitudinal studies have found rheumatoid arthritis [9], painful musculoskeletal conditions [7] and migraine [10] to have a negative influence on pre-existing sleep difficulties.

In the latter study by Singareddy et al. [10] migraine was identified as a significant risk factor for insomnia in the univariate analyses, but not in the multivariate analyses. However, in their multivariate analyses migraine was included in a ”mixed group of individuals with physical health complaints” consisting of e.g. asthma, allergy, anemia, and kidney disease. The study by Singareddy et al. also included other important methodological differences which may explain divergent results, like different population at risk (they included subjects with poor sleep), different way to diagnose migraine (self rapport according to ’physical based diagnosis’), and number of study participants (1246 versus 19,271 in the present study).

The present study provides evidence that headache (migraine and non-migraineous) and CMSCs increases the risk of insomnia. Individuals with persistent headache in both surveys had the strongest association with insomnia in HUNT 3. The fact that both headache and CMSCs increased the risk of insomnia might reflect that the found association is not attributed to either of the conditions themselves, but more generally linked to the experience of pain over time. Indeed, several other painful conditions are linked to poor sleep [79]. Further, the results of the present study were most evident for headache ≥ 7 days / month, in accordance with other studies emphasizing the importance of the frequency of pain [37]. Interestingly, we have previously identified insomnia as a risk factor for primary headaches 11 years later [26]. Thus, as previous suggested by other studies [38] there might be a reciprocal relationship between headache and insomnia, with each disorder increasing the risk of onset of the other. In contrast, in a study on a mixed group of pain disorders (headache included), pain was not a reliable predictor for subsequent sleep, while cognitive arousals could predict the ensuing sleep quality [39]. In the same study, sleep quality was a predictor of pain the next day, and good sleep quality relieved pain the first half of the day [39]. However, this study looked at the short-time relationship between pain and sleep [39], which might differ from a long term perspective.

If a reciprocal relationship between headache and insomnia do exist, they can be causally related, with insomnia causing headache, and vice versa, but one cannot exclude the possibility of a common neurobiological substrate predisposing to both conditions [38]. Although the exact nature of this bidirectional relationship remains unclear, it might lead to an evil circle where one disorder exacerbates the other [3]. The trigger might be either of the conditions [40], and regarding the results of the present study there are several theories on how pain might lead to sleep difficulties.

One possible mechanism is that chronic pain leads to structural changes in areas of the brain regulating sleep [40]. Pain may also cause cognitive pre-sleep arousal, which disturbs the initiation of sleep [37]. Others believe that painful conditions like headache might lead to sleep-seeking behavior to relieve the pain, which in turn leads to bad sleep habits and insomnia [41].

One interesting aspect of these theories is that better pain management might relieve sleep difficulties as well [3]. If there is a bidirectional relationship between painful conditions and sleep disturbances, patients might benefit from a more systematic approach to treatment of insomnia, as well as headache and CMSCs [3]. Further prospective studies should evaluate whether effective treatment of headache and CMSCs could prevent future insomnia.

Conclusion

Headache and CMSCs (particularly frequent headache, widespread CMSCs or the combination of the two) increase the risk for insomnia after 11 years.

Abbreviations

ARC: 

American College of Rheumatology

BMI: 

Body Mass Index

BP: 

Blood pressure

CAGE: 

Cut down, Annoyed, Guilty and Eye-opener (screening tool for alcohol dependency)

CI: 

Confidence Interval

CMSCs: 

Chronic musculoskeletal complaints

DSM-IV: 

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition

GI: 

Gastrointestinal

HADS: 

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

HUNT: 

The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study

ICD-9: 

International Classification of Disease, ninth Edition

ICD-10: 

International Classification of Disease, tenth Edition

ICSD-2: 

The International Classification of Sleep Disorders, second Edition

IHS: 

International Headache Society

OR: 

Odds ratio.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (The HUNT study) is a collaboration between The HUNT Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), and the Nord-Trøndelag County Council.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neuroscience; Faculty of medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, MTFS
(2)
Norwegian National Headache Centre, Section of Neurology, St. Olavs Hospital
(3)
FORMI and Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo

References

  1. Bjorngaard JH, Bjerkeset O, Romundstad P, Gunnell D: Sleeping problems and suicide in 75,000 Norwegian adults: a 20 year follow-up of the HUNT I study. Sleep 2011, 34: 1155–1159.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Leger D, Bayon V: Societal costs of insomnia. Sleep Med Rev 2010, 14: 379–389. 10.1016/j.smrv.2010.01.003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Smith MT, Haythornthwaite JA: How do sleep disturbance and chronic pain inter-relate? Insights from the longitudinal and cognitive-behavioral clinical trials literature. Sleep Med Rev 2004, 8: 119–132. 10.1016/S1087-0792(03)00044-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Wilson KG, Eriksson MY, D'Eon JL, Mikail SF, Emery PC: Major depression and insomnia in chronic pain. Clin J Pain 2002, 18: 77–83. 10.1097/00002508-200203000-00002PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Lavigne G, Zucconi M, Castronovo C, Manzini C, Marchettini P, Smirne S: Sleep arousal response to experimental thermal stimulation during sleep in human subjects free of pain and sleep problems. Pain 2000, 84: 283–290. 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00213-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Blagestad T, Pallesen S, Lunde LH, Sivertsen B, Nordhus IH, Gronli J: Sleep in older chronic pain patients: a comparative polysomnographic study. Clin J Pain 2012, 28: 277–283. 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182313899PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Katz DA, McHorney CA: Clinical correlates of insomnia in patients with chronic illness. Arch Intern Med 1998, 158: 1099–1107. 10.1001/archinte.158.10.1099PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. LeBlanc M, Merette C, Savard J, Ivers H, Baillargeon L, Morin CM: Incidence and risk factors of insomnia in a population-based sample. Sleep 2009, 32: 1027–1037.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nicassio PM, Wallston KA: Longitudinal relationships among pain, sleep problems, and depression in rheumatoid arthritis. J Abnorm Psychol 1992, 101: 514–520.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Singareddy R, Vgontzas AN, Fernandez-Mendoza J, Liao D, Calhoun S, Shaffer ML, Bixler EO: Risk factors for incident chronic insomnia: a general population prospective study. Sleep Med 2012, 13: 346–353. 10.1016/j.sleep.2011.10.033PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hagen K, Zwart JA, Vatten L, Stovner LJ, Bovim G: Head-HUNT: validity and reliability of a headache questionnaire in a large population-based study in Norway. Cephalalgia 2000, 20: 244–251. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00049.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hagen K, Albretsen C, Vilming ST, Salvesen R, Gronning M, Helde G, Gravdahl G, Zwart JA, Stovner LJ: A 4-year follow-up of patients with medication-overuse headache previously included in a randomized multicentre study. J Headache Pain 2011, 12: 315–322. 10.1007/s10194-010-0285-1PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Aamodt AH, Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Brathen G, Zwart J: Headache prevalence related to smoking and alcohol use. The Head-HUNT Study. Eur J Neurol 2006, 13: 1233–1238. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01492.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Aamodt AH, Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Zwart JA: Comorbidity of headache and gastrointestinal complaints, the Head-HUNT study. Cephalalgia 2008, 28: 144–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hagen K, Thoresen K, Stovner LJ, Zwart JA: High dietary caffeine consumption is associated with a modest increase in headache prevalence: results from the Head-HUNT Study. J Headache Pain 2009, 10: 153–159. 10.1007/s10194-009-0114-6PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hagen K, Stovner LJ, Vatten L, Holmen J, Zwart JA, Bovim G: Blood pressure and risk of headache: a prospective study of 22 685 adults in Norway. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002, 72: 463–466.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Varkey E, Hagen K, Zwart JA, Linde M: Physical activity and headache: results from the Nord-Trondelag Health Study (HUNT). Cephalalgia 2008, 28: 1292–1297. 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01678.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Mayfield D, McLeod G, Hall P: The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. Am J Psychiatry 1974, 131: 1121–1123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society: Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia 1988,7(8):1–96.Google Scholar
  20. Hagen K, Linde M, Heuch I, Stovner LJ, Zwart JA: Increasing prevalence of chronic musculoskeletal complaints. A large 11-year follow-up in the general population (HUNT 2 and 3). Pain Med 2011, 12: 1657–1666. 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01240.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sorensen F, Andersson G, Jorgensen K: Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon 1987, 18: 233–237. 10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Palmer K, Smith G, Kellingray S, Cooper C: Repeatability and validity of an upper limb and neck discomfort questionnaire: the utility of the standardized Nordic questionnaire. Occup Med (Lond) 1999, 49: 171–175. 10.1093/occmed/49.3.171View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C, Goldenberg DL, Tugwell P, Campbell SM, Abeles M, Clark P: The American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria for the Classification of Fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 1990, 33: 160–172. 10.1002/art.1780330203PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Jansson C, Nordenstedt H, Wallander MA, Johansson S, Johnsen R, Hveem K, Lagergren J: A population-based study showing an association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and sleep problems. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009, 7: 960–965. 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.03.007PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sivertsen B, Krokstad S, Overland S, Mykletun A: The epidemiology of insomnia: associations with physical and mental health. The HUNT-2 study. J Psychosom Res 2009, 67: 109–116. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.05.001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Odegard SS, Sand T, Engstrom M, Stovner LJ, Zwart JA, Hagen K: The long-term effect of insomnia on primary headaches: a prospective population-based cohort study (HUNT-2 and HUNT-3). Headache 2011, 51: 570–580. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.01859.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Engstrøm M, Qdegård S, Sand T, Stovner L, Zwart J, Hagen K: The Reliability of a New Sleep Screening Questionnaire for LargePopulation-Based Studies: The Third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study. Open Sleep J 2011, 4: 14–19. 10.2174/1874620901104010014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Hagen K, Zwart JA, Aamodt AH, Nilsen KB, Brathen G, Helde G, Stjern M, Tronvik EA, Stovner LJ: The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trondelag Health Study 2006–2008. J Headache Pain 2010, 11: 67–73. 10.1007/s10194-009-0174-7PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Hagen K, Zwart JA, Vatten L, Stovner LJ, Bovim G: Prevalence of migraine and non-migrainous headache--head-HUNT, a large population-based study. Cephalalgia 2000, 20: 900–906. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00145.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Sivertsen B, Salo P, Mykletun A, Hysing M, Pallesen S, Krokstad S, Nordhus IH, Overland S: The Bidirectional Association Between Depression and Insomnia: The HUNT Study. Psychosom Med 2012,74(7):758–765. 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182648619PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Krystal AD, Edinger JD: Measuring sleep quality. Sleep Med 2008,9(Suppl 1):S10–17.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Shekleton JA, Rogers NL, Rajaratnam SM: Searching for the daytime impairments of primary insomnia. Sleep Med Rev 2010, 14: 47–60. 10.1016/j.smrv.2009.06.001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanchez-Ortuno MM, Edinger JD, Wyatt JK: Daytime symptom patterns in insomnia sufferers: is there evidence for subtyping insomnia? J Sleep Res 2011, 20: 425–433. 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2010.00905.xPubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Rajda M, Bilsbury CD: Insomnia treatment: measuring the elusive daytime impairment. Sleep Med 2005, 6: 571. 10.1016/j.sleep.2005.04.003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. American Academy of Sleep Medicine: International Classification of sleep disorders: Diagnostic and coding manual. 2nd edition. Ill, American Academy of sleep medicine, Westchester; 2005.Google Scholar
  36. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th edition. American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC; 1994.Google Scholar
  37. Palermo TM, Wilson AC, Lewandowski AS, Toliver-Sokol M, Murray CB: Behavioral and psychosocial factors associated with insomnia in adolescents with chronic pain. Pain 2011, 152: 89–94. 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.035PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Alberti A: Headache and sleep. Sleep Med Rev 2006, 10: 431–437. 10.1016/j.smrv.2006.03.003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Tang NK, Goodchild CE, Sanborn AN, Howard J, Salkovskis PM: Deciphering the temporal link between pain and sleep in a heterogeneous chronic pain patient sample: a multilevel daily process study. Sleep 2012, 35: 675–687A.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Foo H, Mason P: Brainstem modulation of pain during sleep and waking. Sleep Med Rev 2003, 7: 145–154. 10.1053/smrv.2002.0224PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Ong JC, Stepanski EJ, Gramling SE: Pain coping strategies for tension-type headache: possible implications for insomnia? J Clin Sleep Med 2009, 5: 52–56.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ødegård et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.