Open Access

Migraine in childhood: biobehavioural or psychosomatic disorder?

The Journal of Headache and PainOfficial Journal of the "European Headache Federation" and of "Lifting The Burden - The Global Campaign against Headache"201617:82

DOI: 10.1186/s10194-016-0675-0

Received: 10 August 2016

Accepted: 6 September 2016

Published: 8 September 2016

Abstract

It is well documented that headache is a multifactorial disorder which includes not only genetic, biological, medical and neuropsychological factor but also psychological and personality traits. The close relationship between stress and migraine attacks and the significant psychiatric comorbidities in migraine provide evidence of a “paradigm” of tight interaction between somatic and psychological aspects in paediatric migraine. In particular in younger children, an uncomfortable situation, a psychological problem or an emotional distress is rarely expressed directly but usually through physical symptoms. So migraine may be considered as a disorder of psychobiological adaptation in which genetic predisposition interplays with internal and/or external environmental influences such as psycho-emotional, climatic, hormonal, dietary or other factors.

Keywords

Migraine Psychological comorbidities Psychosomatic disorder Biobehavioural disorder

In the preface to the 1970 edition of “Migraine” [1], Oliver Sacks says “Some patients I could help with drugs, and some with the magic of attention and interest…it now became apparent to me that many migraine attacks were drenched in emotional significance.” Oliver Sacks recognizes the importance of psychological factors in the pathogenesis of migraine and points to the psychosomatic nature of this disorder. When a child with migraine is referred to a doctor, the doctor may be often surprised by the large amount of accompanying symptoms and comorbidities at the time point of investigation or in the past clinical history: soft neurological signs [2], sleep disturbances [3], allergy [4], problems with school achievement [5], lack of concentration [5], school phobia [5], hyperactivity [6], periodic syndromes [7], anxiety and depression [8, 9], as well as panic attacks [10]. Both the close relationship between stress and migraine attacks and the significant psychiatric comorbidities in migraine provide evidence of a “paradigm” of tight interaction between somatic and psychological aspects in paediatric migraine. This interaction characterizes migraine in children and adolescents as a disorder on the edge between paediatrics and psychiatry. Thus, migraine is one of the typical disorders illustrating an exciting dichotomy between mind and body as well as between health and disease [11].

Migraine may be considered as a disorder of psychobiological adaptation in which genetic predisposition interplays with internal and/or external environmental influences such as psycho-emotional, climatic, hormonal, dietary or other factors [11]. In this context we should postulate that there is a mutual pathogenetic link between migrainous headaches and the loss of the ability to balance homoeostatic changes which occur under the influence of different stressors.

Indeed the role of a maladaptive stress response in migraine has become of great interest in recent years [12, 13]. Studies have focused in particular on the default mode network (DMN), which plays an important role in adaptive behavior and in several cognitive processes, such as memory and social evaluation, the ability to understand the emotions of other people and the ability to reflect about one’s own emotional state. DMN is considered a network associated to individual stressful experiences and coping strategies to promote adaptation (i.e. allostasis) [1416]. Tessitore et al. [14] demonstrated a decreased functional connectivity within the prefrontal and temporal cortices of the DMN in patients with Migraine without Aura (MwA) during the interictal period. The authors believe that these reduced connectivity in DMN may represent an early migraine biomarker, probably associated to a maladaptive brain response. Moreover Default mode network (DMN), which is impaired in headache patients, plays an important role also in the ability to understand the emotions of other people and the ability to reflect about one’s own emotional state. Indeed recent research found higher levels of alexithymia in headache patients than in controls and alexythimia seems to be associated to a higher risk of developing psychosomatic complaints and psychological problems [17]. Specific changes in connectivity of DMN could be associated to the difficulty to regulate emotions and to express feelings.

Therefore individuals with alexithymia are more likely to have headache and other somatic complaints because they would lack the necessary skills to modulate the emotions and the adequate coping reaction to a stressful situation.

However the link between stress and migraine remains difficult to understand fully.

It is well known that answer to stress is related more to quantity and intensity of individual emotional activation induced by the stimulus or the situation, than to the quality of stressors.

Stress can provoke biological modifications lowering the threshold of the individual’s susceptibility to a migraine attack. As a consequence stress could also precipitate illness in susceptible individuals [18]. Indeed, it seems likely that the well-known hypersensitivity to pain common in the majority of migraine patients, is related more to how these stimuli are individually processed than to their intrinsic nature [19]. In this sense, pain in migraineurs could be considered as the external manifestation of the “alarm” reaction inducing response to the stress.

As an example, a significant increase in the prevalence of headache was found in children from 3 to 11 years of age [2022] mainly during the transition from preschool years to the elementary school [23]. This change may in fact represent a high stress load and increased requirements on adaptive abilities in a child’s life which may results in homoeostatic unbalances and in headache.

In its original function, pain initiates adaptive processes, like preparation to fight or escape/avoidance reactions, in association with anger or anxiety, by the chronic exposure, may lead to depression [8, 9, 24, 25]. Welch [26] suggested that migraine attacks may results from the functional activation of the sympathetic nervous as an expression of the fight or flight reactions. According to Cannons’ fight or flight theory, the peripheral sympathetic activation during any stressful situation can be attributed to the central perception and processing of stressful events. In migraine patients, this central sensory processing will be initiated in the visual system [26]. Both the sensory input and the autonomous reaction to a significant stimulus are regulated by the frontal cortex. Therefore, migraine attacks seem to occur as a consequence of the imbalance between the brain stem projections upon the intrinsic noradrenergic system and frontal regulatory executive mechanisms resulting in sensory and sympathetic hyper-activation [26]. This theory helps to understand what happens during a migraine attack, but it does not explain why children with migraine are sensible to stressors in the headache-free interval.

Arena and colleagues [27] postulate that the psycho-behavioural characteristics of migraine sufferers are related to an individual emotional-reactive pattern established before the first migraine attack and occur independently of attacks. Guidetti and Ottaviano [28] followed, for over 9 years, 102 full-term newborn healthy infants, who were hyper-reactive in infancy and 80 matched infants, who were not hyper-reactive. Of the 102 children of the first group, 78 (76 %) developed headache or periodic syndromes. This was the case in only 15 (19 %) of the 80 control children. The average age of onset of headache was 7 years. The same authors compared a group of 40 children with MwA with 70 children without headaches for nine temperamental variables (Middle Childhood Temperamental Questionnaire): activity, predictability, approach, adaptability, intensity, mood, persistence, distractibility and threshold. They found that migrainous children had greater hyperactivity and distractibility but lower adaptability, persistence and threshold [2].

Bearing in mind Welch’s hypothesis concerning the significance of frontal function for development of migraine attacks [26], it is worthy to mention that disorders of prefrontal function often result in high distractibility, low persistence, low threshold to stimulation and low adaptability [29]. These observations provide an evidence for the described altered balance between abnormal frontal function, cortical hypersensitivity and sympathetic hyperactivity in children with migraine. Additional evidence of abnormal frontal function in migraineurs may be found in experimental studies which report cognitive impairment in migraine patients in tests of visual attention [30], simple reaction time [31], verbal ability [32] and information processing speed [33].

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) found a high prevalence of white matter lesions (WMLs) in patients suffering from migraine which could explain executive deficits. Camarda et al. [34] showed that patients with MwA have cognitive disturbances in tasks assessing executive functions, and that these deficits are associated with the duration and intensity of migraine attacks. Thus they suggested that cognitive dysfunction in migraine may be a consequence of the cumulative effects of repeated migraine attacks leading to subcortical WMLs. However findings are mixed: some studies have not showed differences in executive functions between migraineurs and controls [35]; other studies suggest that the presence of executive deficits in migraine exists, but it is not related to the presence of WMLs [36].

How can the increased sensitivity to stress as well as the psychobehavioral features of migraineurs be explained from a neurophysiological point of view? The most appropriate explanation may be the hypothesis describing abnormal interaction between the Arousal Unit and frontal executive system in migraineurs [37]. The Arousal Unit, which comprises an important group of cells throughout the romboencephalon, mesencephalon and diencephalon, is functionally specialized in the maintenance of the levels of cortical tone (arousal), of attention as well as of perceptual and behavioural reactivity. Therefore, it may influence many behavioural characteristics like adaptability, persistence, threshold to stimulation and, in such a way, temperament. This hypothesis seems to be supported by Rothbart’s [38] definition of temperament that represents “individual differences in reactivity and self-regulation assuming a constitutional basis with a degree of immutability”. It seems likely that in infants the hyperreactivity of the Arousal Unit in combination with the underdeveloped executive control result in the described behavioural and sensory hyperreactivity. In older children and adolescents, the hyperreactivity of the Arousal Unit is balanced by a better executive control and results in the abnormal information processing which was repeatedly described in migraine patients. For example investigating evoked and event-related potentials, Gerber and Schoenen et al. [39, 40] described a deficient habituation, or even potentiation, of cortical responses during repetitive stimulation between attacks in patients suffering from migraine. Habituation is a natural mechanism protecting the brain against overstimulation. The described lack of habituation may result in central overload and neuro-metabolic shift underlying the beginning of the migraine attack. Indeed, the most pronounced deficit of habituation may occur few days before the beginning of an attack; this altered processing reaches its maximum, and then normalizes during the attack [40, 41]. The lack of habituation may be explained by a possible “thalamo-cortical dysrhythmia”, an altered rhythmic stream between thalamus and cortex, or by an abnormal glutamatergic neurotransmission [40, 41]. Whatever the mechanisms, it seems likely that the abnormal processing of cortical information may represent a necessary link between stress, psychological factors and development of migraine attacks.

Gerber, Schoenen et al. [39, 40] described these mechanisms as an initial disturbance of the modulation of sensory stimulus and reaction of the brain which may result from innate hypo-function of state-setting, in particular of serotoninergic brainstem afferents. These abnormalities may be innate, but they could also be due to learning processes, or, alternatively, there could be an interaction between the genetic and learning processes in the development of the abnormal processing of cortical information in migraine.

It is well documented that headache is a multifactorial disorder which includes not only genetic, medical and neuropsychological factor but also psychological and personality traits. Twin studies found that only about half of the variability is explained by “genetic” factors [42]. Epigenetic mechanisms, mainly occurring during early infancy and childhood, play an important role in the pathophysiology of headaches. Child environment, an early stress and the mother-child relationship are important factors of epigenetic changes in the pathogenesis of migraine [42]. This link between genetic and epigenetic, factors is reflected in a peculiar structure of personality that may predispose to headache attacks or may render the brain more susceptible to trigger factors. Competition, perfectionism, ambition, rigidity and tendency to suppress emotions are some of the common psychological and behavioural characteristics of young and adult with headache [43]. Wolff [44] describes migraine patient as rigid, compulsive, perfectionist, ambitious and competitive. They are shy, withdrawn, sober, polite, well-mannered, conscientious, responsible, unusually thoughtful, and extremely obedient to parental wishes [45]. Bille [46] tested 73 children with migraine occurring at least once a month and 73 headache-free controls. Migraineurs described themselves as more anxious, fearful, tense and nervous, while parents described them as more anxious, sensitive, vulnerable to frustrations, more tidy and less physically enduring that did the parents of children without migraine. Kowal and Pritchard [47] confirmed Bille’s data finding in children with headache more psychosomatic problems and behavioural disturbances.

Galli, Guidetti and colleagues (2006) found that children and adolescents with headache were more likely to have other somatic symptoms (e.g. abdominal pain) [48]. Several periodic syndromes of childhood, including abdominal migraine were described like common precursors of migraine. Romanello et al. found [49] a specific association between migraine and infantile colic, suggesting a common pathophysiology of migraine and infantile colic. The pathogenesis of abdominal migraine could be inked to an increased arousal in the central nervous system (CNS) in response to triggers, thus releasing neuropeptides and neurotransmitters that lead to dysregulation of the gastrointestinal system [50]. Furthermore calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP), released during migraine attacks [51] is also potentially involved in the pathogenesis of abdominal pain by inducing the neurogenic inflammation of sensory neurons in the gut [49].

Andrasik [52] confirms these data finding that children that are more depressed express a greater number of somatic complaints and experiencing more internalizing behaviour disorders, such as anxiety and mood disorders. This author noted that one limitation of his study was the lack of a control group of children who had pain from causes other than migraine; therefore he couldn’t rule out the possibility that the personality differences could be the result of chronic pain disorder [53]. Indeed Cunningham [45] compared a group of migrainous children with another with chronic musculoskeletal pain. He did not find any difference in children with different disorders: both groups had somatic complaints including vomiting, nausea, perceptual disturbances and internalizing behaviour problems, all migraine-related phenomena. He suggested that perhaps the personality and behavioural features thought to be characteristic of migraine may instead be related to the experience of chronic pain.

On the other hand, Wayne Holder and others [54] underline the influence of parental behaviour in the maintenance of headache in childhood. Indeed previous studies on children with migraine reported a rigorous and strict familiar environment, demanding discipline with high levels of conventionality, low levels of intimacy and emotional participation [55].

Furthermore many studies have reported that headache in children and adolescents is related to several psychosocial factors, such as maternal depression, psychopathology in childhood, social disadvantage and a family with a history of “painful conditions” [8, 9, 56].

Zuckerman and colleagues [57] found that stomach aces and headaches in pre-school children were strictly associated with maternal depression. Our group tried to focus the attention on the mother-migrainous child link [58], comparing a group of 24 children with migraine without aura to a group of in-patient peers, with a similar chronic pathology with acute exacerbations (recurrent upper respiratory airways infections). The mothers of all patients answered a questionnaire on complete family and personal history to assess the presence of migraine, psychiatric, psychosomatic and neurological disease, use of hypnotic, tranquillizer and antidepressant drugs, and traumatic events. After that a semi-structured interview consisting of 57 items, exploring six different areas (pregnancy, delivery and perinatal period, first year of life of the baby, mother-child relationship after the first year of life, school adjustment, child’s rhythm and the family) was administered to the mothers. The mothers of the migrainous children had significant higher scores for migraine and psychiatric comorbidity (anxiety and depression) and for drug use [57]. They reported more psychological distress during delivery and during the perinatal period and more difficulties to adapt to the child’s needs. The mother-child relationship interferes on peculiar temperamental component of the child and vice-versa, and it plays a role in the occurrence of migraine attacks [59].

Several studies describe the influence of maternal psychological symptoms, maternal chronic pain, and parenting stress on children somatic complaints [60]. Dura and Beck [61] found that the children of mothers with chronic pain have more depression than two other control groups. Empirical evidence shows that parents with difficulty to regulate emotions and to express feelings, can inhibit the child’s ability to self-regulate his/her emotional states, thus influencing the bodily experience with the tendency to somatization [62]. Livingston, studying children of people with somatization disorders, assume that “all their children are at some risk for developing somatization disorder” and that “those who have begun having medically unexplained physical symptoms are likely to be experiencing the early stages of developing disorder”[63, 64].

Furthermore clinical and epidemiological evidence suggests that migraine co-occurs with psychopathology [65]

Merikangas [66] in her seminal paper on migraine and psychopathology finding a strong correlation between migraine, anxiety and depression, concluded: “Initial expression of anxiety, often in early childhood, was followed by the occurrence of migraine headaches and then by discrete episodes of depressive disorders in adolescence or in adulthood”. It is well known that headache in childhood is associated with several psychopathological states [56], in particular depression and anxiety [8, 9], epilepsy [67], sleep disorders [3], attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [6] which all seem to be related to headache.

The Young-Hunt Study [68], a large-scale population-based study in Norway assessing adolescent recurrent headache in relation to symptoms of anxiety and depression and behavioral problems, found that adolescents aged 12–17 years with headache have higher levels of anxiety and depression and that, especially between aged 15–17, higher levels of attention and conduct difficulties. Furthermore Arruda et al. [69] showed not only that children with headache are more likely to present with emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity and peer problems, but also that they are at an increased risk of impaired psychosocial adjustment. The authors believe that the association between psychosocial adjustment problems and the burden caused by migraine may perpetuate both conditions.

Therefore the current theory explains headache like a complex multifactorial disorder with both predisposing genetic factors and environmental factors contributing to the attacks [70].

The impact of environmental factors on headache is furthermore well documented by many studies on the association between childhood adversity and chronic daily headache [7175]. Some life events such as divorce, physical and sexual abuse are recognised as a risk factors for headache and its chronicity [76]. In particular abuse could have some effect at a neurobiological and epigenetic level, which could play a role in the pathogenesis of migraine [75].

The wide influence of environmental factors on migraine has led to consider migraine as a bio-psychosocial condition, caused by cognitive, emotional and environmental factors, as well as biological [77].

Conclusions

In his seminal paper on psychosomatic, Alexander [78] defined a psychosomatic problem as “an individual psychodynamic adjustment that expresses itself in peculiar circumstances”. Psychosomatics represent an interaction between psychic and physical aspects with the former having an establishing effect on the latter. Mainly in younger children, an uncomfortable situation, a psychological problem or an emotional distress is rarely expressed directly but usually through physical symptoms. The body can be seen as mediator of the environmental stressors and psychological factors and the tendency to develop head pain when faced with strong sensory stimuli or physical or emotional stress might be the result of an evolved defence mechanism [79]. Indeed humans seem to be the only species that experiences migraine, so citing Loder [79] “vulnerability to recurrent headache may be the price we pay for consciousness”.

Abbreviations

DMN: 

Default Mode Network

MwA: 

Migraine without Aura

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

WMLs: 

White Matter Lesions

CNS: 

Central Nervous System

CGRP: 

Calcitonin-Gene-Related Peptide

Declarations

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.

Authors’ contributions

VG and NF conceived and designed the study. MS is responsible for critical revision of this manuscript. VG, NF and MS were responsible for data acquisition. All authors approved the final version of this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pediatric and Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome
(2)
Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Christian-Albrechts-University

References

  1. Oliver Sacks (1970/1992). Migraine. Berkeley: University California Press.
  2. Tremolizzo L, Ferrario S, Pellegrini A, Fumagalli L, Ferrarese C, Apollonio I (2015) Neurological soft signs in primary headache patients. Neurosci Letter 595:41–44View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellini B, Panunzi S, Bruni O, Guidetti V (2013) Headache and sleep in children. Curr Pain Headache Rep 17(6):335View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Martin VT, Taylor F, Gebhardt B, Tomaszewski M, Ellison JS, Martin GV, Levin L, Al-Shaikh E, Nicolas J, Bernstein JA (2011) Allergy and immunotherapy: are they related to migraine headache? Headache 51(1):8–20View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hurrelmann K, Engel U, Holler B, Nordlohne E (1988) Failure in school, family conflicts, and psychosomatic disorders in adolescence. J Adolesc 11:237–49View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Arruda MA, Guidetti V, Galli F, Albuquerque RC, Bigal ME (2010) Migraine, tension-type headache, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in childhood: a population-based study. Postgrad Med 122(5):18–26View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gelfand AA (2015) Episodic syndromes that may be associated with migraine: A.K.A. “the Childhood Periodic Syndromes”. Headache 55(10):1358–64View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bellini B, Arruda M, Cescut A, Saulle C, Persico A, Carotenuto M, Gatta M, Nacinovich R, Piazza FP, Termine C, Tozzi E, Lucchese F, Guidetti V (2013) Headache and comorbidity in children and adolescents. J Headache Pain 14:79View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Ligthart L, Gerrits MM, Boomsma DI, Penninx BW (2013) Anxiety and depression are associated with migraine and pain in general: an investigation of the interrelationships. J Pain 14(4):363–70View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Smitherman TA, Kolivas ED, Bailey JR (2013) Panic disorder and migraine: comorbidity, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Headache 53(1):23–45View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nappi G, Savoldi F (1985) Headache. Diagnostic System and Taxonomic Criteria. John Libbey Eurotext, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Maleki N, Becerra L, Borsook D (2012) Migraine: maladaptive brain responses to stress. Headache 52(Suppl 2):102–6View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Borsook D, Maleki N, Becerra L, McEwen B (2012) Understanding migraine through the lens of maladaptive stress responses: a model disease of allostatic load. Neuron 73(2):219–34View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tessitore A, Russo A, Giordano A, Conte F, Corbo D, De Stefano M, Cirillo S, Cirillo M, Esposito F, Tedeschi G (2013) Disrupted default mode network connectivity in migraine without aura. J Headache Pain 14:89View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Soares JM, Sampaio A, Ferreira LM, Santos NC, Marques P, Marques F, Palha JA, Cerqueira JJ, Sousa N (2013) Stress impact on resting state brain networks. PLoS One 8(6):e66500View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. McEwen BS, Gianaros PJ (2011) Stress- and allostasis-induced brain plasticity. Annu Rev Med 62:431–45View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Cerutti R, Valastro C, Tarantino S, Valeriani M, Faedda N, Spensieri V, Guidetti V (2016) Alexithymia and psychopathological symptoms in adolescent outpatients and mothers suffering from migraines: a case control study. J Headache Pain 17:39View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Radat F (2013) Stress and migraine. Rev Neurol (Paris) 169(5):406–12View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Klein SM (1981) Perception of stimulus intensity by migraine and non migraine subjects. Headache 23:58–62Google Scholar
  20. Borge AI, Nordhagen R, Moe B, Botten G, Bakketeig LS (1994) Prevalence and persistence of stomach ache and headache among children. Follow-up of a cohort of Norwegian children from 4 to 10 years of age. Acta Paediatr 83:433–437View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lateef TM, Merikangas KR, He J et al (2009) Headache in a national sample of American children: prevalence and comorbidity. J Child Neurol 24:536–543View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Kröner-Herwig B, Heinrich M, Morris L (2007) Headache in German children and adolescents: a population-based epidemiological study. Cephalalgia 27:519–527View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ostkirchen GG, Andler F, Hammer F et al (2006) Prevalences of primary headache symptoms at school-entry: a population-based epidemiological survey of preschool children in Germany. J Headache Pain 7:331–340View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Tarantino S, De Ranieri C, Dionisi C, Citti M, Capuano A, Galli F, Guidetti V, Vigevano F, Gentile S, Presaghi F, Valeriani M (2013) Clinical features, anger management and anxiety: a possible correlation in migraine children. J Headache Pain 14:39View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Guidetti V, Antonelli A, Donazzan S, Faedda N, Natalucci G (2015) Poster presentation P015. Externalizing behaviours in children with headache and epilepsy: a case-control study. J Headache Pain 16(Suppl 1):A144View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Welch KMA (1989) The Cummings Lecture. In: Clifford Rose F (ed) New advance in headache research. Smith-Gordon, London, pp 15–24Google Scholar
  27. Arena JG, Andrasik F, Blanchard EB (1985) The role of personality in the etiology of chronic headache. Headache 25:296–301View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Guidetti V, Ottaviano S (1984) Headache risk symptoms in the first six months of life. Cephalalgia 4:237–244View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Mesulam MM (1986) Frontal cortex and behavior. Ann Neurol 19:320–25View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Villa TR, Correa Moutran AR, Sobirai Diaz LA, Pereira Pinto MM, Carvalho FA, Gabbai AA, de Souza Carvalho D (2009) Visual attention in children with migraine: a controlled comparative study. Cephalalgia 29(6):631–4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Riva D, Aggio F, Vago C, Nichelli F, Andreucci E, Paruta N, D’Arrigo S, Pantaleoni C, Bulgheroni S (2006) Cognitive and behavioural effects of migraine in childhood and adolescence. Cephalalgia 26:596–603View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Waldie KE, Hausmann M, Milne BJ, Poulton R (2002) Migraine and cognitive function. A life-course study. Neurology 59:904–908, 27 Headache and cognitive profile in children: a cross-sectional controlled studyView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Calandre EP, Bembibre J, Arnedo ML, Becera D (2002) Cognitive disturbances and regional cerebral blood flow abnormalities in migraine patients: their relationship with the clinical manifestations of the illness. Cephalalgia 22:291–302View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Camarda C, Monastero R, Pipia C, Recca D, Camarda R (2007) Interictal executive dysfunction in migraineurs without aura: relationship with duration and intensity of attacks. Cephalalgia 27(10):1094–100View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gaist D, Pedersen L, Madsen C, Tsiropoulos I, Bak S, Sindrup S, Gaist D, Pedersen L, Madsen C, Tsiropoulos I, Bak S, Sindrup S et al (2005) Long-term effects of migraine on cognitive function: a population-based study of Danish twins. Neurology 64:600–7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Le Pira F, Reggio E, Quattrocchi G, Sanfilippo C, Maci T, Cavallaro T, Zappia M (2014) Executive dysfunctions in migraine with and without aura: what is the role of white matter lesions? Headache 54(1):125–30View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Luria A (1980) Higher Cortical Function in Man. Basic Books, New YorkView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Rothbart MK (1981) Measurement of temperament in infancy. Child Dev 52:569–78View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Gerber WD, Schoenen J (1995) Migraine etiopathogenesis-new vistas.“born to be wild?”. In: Farkas V (ed) 3rd Congress on headache in childhood and adolescence Abstract book., p 15Google Scholar
  40. Coppola G, Di Lorenzo C, Schoenen J, Pierelli F (2013) Habituation and sensitization in primary headaches. J Headache Pain 14:65View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Siniatchkin M, Sendacki M, Moeller F, Wolff S, Jansen O, Siebner H, Stephani U (2012) Abnormal changes of synaptic excitability in migraine with aura. Cereb Cortex 22(10):2207–16View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Montagna P (2008) Migraine: a genetic disease? Neurol Sci 29(Suppl 1):S47–51View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Guidetti V, Galli F (2002) Psychiatric comorbidity in chronic daily headache: pathophysiology, etiology, and diagnosis. Curr Pain Headache Rep 6(6):492–7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wolff HG (1937) Personality features and reactions of subjects with migraine. Arch Neur Psych 37(4):895–921View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Cunningham SJ, McGrath PJ, Ferguson HB, Humphreys P, D’Astous J, Latter J, Goodman JT, Firestone P (1987) Personality and behavioral characteristics in pediatric migraine. Headache 27:16–20View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Bille B (1962) Migraine in school children. Acta Ped Scandinavica 51:1–151View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Kowal A, Prithchard D (1990) Psychological characteristics of children who suffer from heaDache: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiat 31(4):637–649View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Galli F, D’Antuono G, Tarantino S, Viviano F, Borrelli O, Chirumbolo A, Cucchiara S, Guidetti V (2007) Headache and recurrent abdominal pain: a controlled study by the means of the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL). Cephalalgia 27(3):211–9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Romanello S, Spiri D, Marcuzzi E, Zanin A, Boizeau P, Riviere S, Vizeneux A, Moretti R, Carbajal R, Mercier JC, Wood C, Zuccotti GV, Crichiutti G, Alberti C, Titomanlio L (2013) Association between childhood migraine and history of infantile colic. JAMA 309(15):1607–12View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Spiri D, Rinaldi VE, Titomanlio L (2014) Pediatric migraine and episodic syndromes that may be associated with migraine. Ital J Pediatr 40:92View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Ho TW, Edvinsson L, Goadsby PJ (2010) CGRP and its receptors provide new insights into migraine pathophysiology. Nat Rev Neurol 6(10):573–582View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Andrasik F (1987) Psychological functioning of children who have recurrent migraine. In: McGrath PJ, Unruh AM (eds) Pain in Children and Adolescents. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 198Google Scholar
  53. Andrasik F, Kabela E, Quinn S, Attanasio V, Blanchard EB, Rosenblum EL (1988) Psychological functioning of children who have recurrent migraine. Pain 34:43–52View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wayne Holden E, Gladstein J, Trulsen M, Wall B (1995) Chronic daily headache in children and adolescents. Headache 34:508–514View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Aromaa M, Sillanpää M, Rautava P, Helenius H (2000) Pediatrics. Pain experience of children with headache and their families: a controlled study. Pediatrics 106(2 Pt 1):270–5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Antonaci F, Voiticovschi-Iosob C, Di Stefano AL, Galli F, Ozge A, Balottin U (2014) The evolution of headache from childhood to adulthood: a review of the literature. J Headache Pain 15:15View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Zuckerman B, Stevenson J, Bailej V (1987) Stomaches and headache in a community sample of preschool children. Pediatrics 79:677–682PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Bruni O, Guidetti V (1993) Does migraine in childhood have a psychosomatic background? Cephalalgia 13:218Google Scholar
  59. Barone L, Lionetti F, Dellagiulia A, Galli F, Molteni S, Balottin U (2015) Behavioural problems in children with headache and maternal stress: is children’s attachment security a protective factor? Infant Child Dev. doi:10.1002/icd.1950 Google Scholar
  60. Wolff N, Darlington AS, Hunfeld J, Verhulst F, Jaddoe V, Hofman A, Passchier J, Tiemeier H (2010) Determinants of somatic complaints in 18-month-old children: the generation R study. J Pediatr Psychol 35(3):306–16View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Dura J, Beck SA (1988) Comparison of family function when mothers have chronic pain. Pain 35:79–89View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Yürümez E, Akça ÖF, Uğur Ç, Uslu RI, Kılıç BG (2014) Mothers’ alexithymia, depression and anxiety levels and their association with the quality of mother-infant relationship: a preliminary study. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 18(3):190–6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Livingston R, Taylor JL, Crawford SL (1988) A study of somatic complaints and psychiatryc diagnosis in children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2:185–87View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Livingston R (1993) Children of people with somatization disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 32(3):536–54View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Brandt J, Celentano D, Stewart W (1990) Personality and emotional disorders in a community sample of migraine headache sufferers. Am J Psychiatry 147:303–308View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Merikangas KR, Angst J, Isler H (1990) Migraine and psychopathology: result of the Zurich cohort study on young adults. Arc Gen Psyc 47:849–85View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Mainieri G, Cevoli S, Giannini G, Zummo L, Leta C, Broli M, Ferri L, Santucci M, Posar A, Avoni P, Cortelli P, Tinuper P, Bisulli F (2015) Headache in epilepsy: prevalence and clinical features. J Headache Pain 16:556View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Blaauw BA, Dyb G, Hagen K, Holmen TL, Linde M, Wentzel-Larsen T, Zwart JA (2014) Anxiety, depression and behavioral problems among adolescents with recurrent headache: the Young-HUNT study. J Headache Pain 15:38View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Arruda MA, Arruda R, Guidetti V, Bigal ME (2015) Psychosocial adjustment of children with migraine and tension-type headache-a nationwide study. Headache 55(Suppl 1):39–50View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Eising E, A Datson N, van den Maagdenberg AM, Ferrari MD (2013) Epigenetic mechanisms in migraine: a promising avenue? BMC Med 11:26View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Zafar M, Kashikar-Zuck SM, Slater SK, Allen JR, Barnett KA, Lecates SL, Kabbouche MA, Hershey AD, Powers SW (2012) Childhood abuse in pediatric patients with chronic daily headache. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 51(6):590–3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Seshia SS (2012) Chronic daily headache in children and adolescents. Curr Pain Headache Rep 16(1):60–72View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Peterlin BL, Ward T, Lidicker J, Levin M (2007) A retrospective, comparative study on the frequency of abuse in migraine and chronic daily headache. Headache 47(3):397–401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Juang KD, Yang CY (2014) Psychiatric comorbidity of chronic daily headache: focus on traumatic experiences in childhood, post-traumatic stress disorder and suicidality. Curr Pain Headache Rep 18(4):405View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Tietjen GE, Peterlin BL (2011) Childhood abuse and migraine: epidemiology, sex differences, and potential mechanisms. Headache 51(6):869–79View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Tietjen GE, Brandes JL, Peterlin BL, Eloff A, Dafer RM, Stein MR, Drexler E, Martin VT, Hutchinson S, Aurora SK, Recober A, Herial NA, Utley C, White L, Khuder SA (2010) Childhood maltreatment and migraine (part II). Emotional abuse as a risk factor for headache chronification. Headache 50(1):32–41View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Cousins S, Ridsdale L, Goldstein LH, Noble AJ, Moorey S, Seed P (2015) A pilot study of cognitive behavioural therapy and relaxation for migraine headache: a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol 262(12):2764–72View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Alexander F (1950) Psychosomatic Medicine. Norton $Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  79. Loder E (2002) What is the evolutionary advantage of migraine? Cephalalgia 22(8):624–32View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016