Open Access

Symptoms of central sensitization and comorbidity for juvenile fibromyalgia in childhood migraine: an observational study in a tertiary headache center

  • Marina de Tommaso1Email author,
  • Vittorio Sciruicchio2,
  • Marianna Delussi1,
  • Eleonora Vecchio1,
  • Marvita Goffredo3,
  • Michele Simeone3 and
  • Maria Grazia Foschino Barbaro3
The Journal of Headache and PainOfficial Journal of the "European Headache Federation" and of "Lifting The Burden - The Global Campaign against Headache"201718:59

https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-017-0764-8

Received: 4 April 2017

Accepted: 9 May 2017

Published: 30 May 2017

Abstract

Background

Central sensitization is an important epiphenomenon of the adult migraine, clinically expressed by allodynia, pericranial tenderness and comorbidity for fibromyalgia in a relevant number of patients. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and the clinical characteristics of allodynia, pericranial tenderness, and comorbidity for Juvenile Fibromialgia (JFM) in a cohort of migraine children selected in a tertiary headache center.

Methods

This was an observational cross-sectional study on 8–15 years old migraine patients. Allodynia was assessed by a questionnaire. Pericranial tenderness and comorbidity for JFM as well as their possible association with poor quality of life and migraine related disability, and with other clinical symptoms as anxiety, depression, sleep disorders and pain catastrophizing, were also evaluated.

Results

One hundred and fifty one patients were selected, including chronic migraine (n°47), migraine without aura (n° 92) and migraine with aura (n° 12) sufferers. Allodynia was reported in the 96,6% and pericranial tenderness was observed in the 68.8% of patients. Pericranial tenderness was more severe in patients with more frequent migraine and shorter sleep duration. Allodynia seemed associated with anxiety, pain catastrophizing and high disability scores. Comorbidity for JFM was present in the 0.03% ofpatients. These children presented with a severe depression and a significant reduction of quality of life as compared to the other patients.

Conclusions

This study outlined a relevant presence of symptoms of central sensitization among children with migraine. Severe allodynia and comorbidity for JFM seemed to cause a general decline of quality of life, which would suggest the opportunity of a routine assessment of these clinical features.

Keywords

Migraine Children Allodynia Pericranial tenderness Juvenile fibromialgia

Background

Migraine is a chronic neurological disorder, with an early onset in childhood and juvenile age. Its genetic basis, though multifactorial, is confirmed by its occurrence in children with first degree inheritance for the disorder [1, 2]. The clinical picture of juvenile headache is different from the adult form, and in fact the last International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd beta edition, includes footnotes for migraine diagnostic criteria in childhood [3, 4]. Central sensitization is an important epiphenomenon of the migraine attack. It is caused by functional modifications of the trigeminal and cervical nociceptive systems and may favor headache worsening and persisting [2]. Allodynia is the clinical manifestation of the central sensitization [5]. It was described in almost the 70% of episodic migraine patients and in the 90% of chronic migraine sufferers, as a factor predicting the chronic evolution of the disease [6, 7]. In a recent study performed in a large cohort of primary headache patients, allodynia was more represented in the group of chronic migraine patients, with a positive correlation with anxiety, depression and disability [8]. In the same study, a short sleep duration seemed to facilitate the symptoms of central sensitization in adult primary headache [8]. In clinical practice, allodynia is measured by a questionnaire validated in large samples of patients in adult age, affected by migraine and other primary headaches [9, 10]. Pericranial tenderness [11] is a sign of persistent activation of the trigeminal and cervical nociceptors, which is present also in the asymptomatic phase of patients with frequent and chronic migraine. [12]. Recent studies reported the presence of symptoms of central sensitization even in childhood migraine [13, 14]. In those studies, allodynia was retrospectively assessed by the use of simplified questionnaires, which allowed to ascertain that this symptom was present in a large number of migraine children [14]. Other signs of central sensitization, as pericranial tenderness or diffusion of pain symptoms outside the trigemino-cervical districts, as for fibromyalgia comorbidity, were rarely assessed in childhood migraine [15, 16] In addition, children with migraine are frequently characterized by psychopathological traits which may facilitate the chronic evolution [17], though their possible influence on central sensitization symptoms may evolve differently than in adult migraine. In a recent study on pain-related evoked potentials in children with migraine, we observed reduced habituation of the cortical responses to pain, which was correlated with allodynia [16]. This latter symptom was found in almost all patients, suggesting a higher representation in the juvenile migraine than in the adult form [16].

Fibromyalgia (FM) is an invalidating painful disorder, whose different aspects may be explained by the increased central sensitization phenomena [18]. A growing number of studies are dealing with Juvenile Fibromyalgia (JFM), which is emerging as a well-documented phenomenon in youth, with studies showing prevalence rates ranging from 2 to 6% of school-age children [1921]. The criteria of diagnosis are similar to those for adult Fibromyalgia [22, 23]. Taking into consideration the impact of FM on the global burden of adult migraine [24, 25], the assessment of frequency and clinical profile of patients with JFM comorbidity would be useful to recognize this potentially disabling aspect of migraine.

The present study aimed to.

1) evaluate the frequency of allodynia, pericranial tenderness and JFM in a population of children with migraine selected in a tertiary headache center.

2) assess if the severity of allodynia,pericranial tenderness and fibromyalgia might be associated a) with the headache-related disability and the interference of pain on quality of life b) with other clinical features as anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing and sleep disturbance.

Methods

Subjects-This was a cross-sectional observational study on childhood migraine. The 8- to 15-years-old children and adolescents were selected among 2400 outpatients suffering from headache, examined consecutively at the Neurophysiopathology of Pain Unit of Bari University between January 2013 and June 2015. This is a tertiary center for headache and chronic pain that is dedicated to both adults and children on distinct days. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of migraine without aura (MA cod. 1.1), migraine with aura (MWA cod 1.2.1) and chronic migraine (CM 1.3), according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders [3]. The exclusion criteria for the present evaluation were the untaking of actual preventive treatments and/or any central nervous system acting drug therapy, comorbidity with general medical diseases and with any other neurologic condition. The diagnosis of migraine was confirmed on the basis of at least 3 months of observation preceding the first visit. Upon the first visit reservation, the hospital staff gave parents the headache diary and the questionnaire of allodynia in the adult version [10, 16], to be presented during the first clinical approach at our Center (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Flow chart reporting main study design

Clinical assessment

All migraine patients and their parents were carefully interviewed by the neurologists and psychologists staff on their first visit to our center. The frequency of the headache was evaluated through the diaries where patients and their parents had reported the days with headache in the last 3 months. Then patients were divided into four categories of frequencies (1–4; 5–9; 10–14; 15–30 days/month).

Pericranial tenderness

It was evaluated in all cases, in accord with previous studies performed in adult and young patients with headache [8, 11, 16].

Allodynia

Mothers were requested to interview children during migraine attack, in order to help them in filling the allodynia questionnaire for each migraine attack. We proposed the same questionnaires employed for adults [8, 16], consisting of the symptoms checklist reported by Lipton et al. [10]. For the allodynia severity, the average number of allodynia symptoms across different attacks was considered. The allodynia questionnaire is not presently adapted for children, so we suggested the parents to indicate as “not applicable” those questions specific to adults. We classified patients as allodynic based on the presence of at least one symptom reported in the questionnaire in over the 50% of the headache episodes.

Juvenile Fibromyalgia comorbidity

In order to individuate the migraine children with the comorbidity for JFM, we applied the most recent criteria for adult Fibromyalgia [22], recently validated also in adolescents [23]. Symptoms of fibromyalgia were examined using the Widespread Pain Index (WPI) and Symptom Severity Index (SSI). These measures were adapted from the 2010 ACR diagnostic criteria for FM [22] and designed to gather information on fibromyalgia symptoms through the children and parents reports.

Migraine disability

The childhood version of the Migraine Disability Assessment was used (PedMIDAS) [26].

Quality of life assessment-The Italian version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) is one of the most used quality of life measures for children aged 2–18 years. Specifically, the child self-report (PedsQL) includes the 5–7 years old younger children, the 8–12 aged children, and the 13–18 years old teens, the second and the third items employed in the present study. The parent proxy report (PedParQL) also includes ages 2–4 (toddlers), 5–7 (younger children), 8–12 (children), and 13–18 (teens). The two forms, for children and parents, are parallel, providing an indication of the child’s and the parent’s perception. The instrument instructions ask how frequently a problem was present during the past 1 month. In the present study, we considered the PedsQL and PedParQL total scores, Physical functioning (PedsQLP, PedParQLP) and Emotional functioning (PedsQLE, PedParQLE) sub scores [27].

Psychopathological assessment

The Psychiatric Self-Administration Scales for Youths and Adolescents was used. [28, 29]. This is an Italian standardized battery which includes self-report scales for the assessment of a wide range of psychiatric symptoms according to the DSM V diagnostic criteria.

The entire battery includes six scales (each with subscales), which can be used together or separately, all provided with satisfactory psychometric properties. The anxiety (SAFA A) and depression (SAFA D) scales were employed for the purposes of the present study.

Sleep assessment

The SDSC (Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children) questionnaire was used to assess quality and disturbances of sleep over the past 6 months in our young patients [30]. In this study the total SDSC score (SDSC-T), and the sub-score SDSC-tt for the total time of sleep were considered. This latter item includes a 1–3 scale to grade total sleep duration. For both the indexes higher values correspond to worse sleep performance.

Pain Catastrophizing

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children [31] is the child version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale developed by Sullivan et al. [32]. Sullivan et al. [32] characterized pain catastrophizing as an “exaggerated negative ‘mental set’ brought to bear during actual or anticipated pain experience”. This 13-item self-report instrument assesses the tendency to catastrophize about pain and three dimensions of catastrophizing, rumination, magnification and helplessness that are subsumed under the higher-order construct of pain catastrophizing. Furthermore, according to the authors, [31] the total Pain Catastrophizing score (PCS-S) predicts pain severity and pain-related disability in pediatric pain patients.

The study was approved by the local Ethic Committee of Bari Policlinico General Hospital. Parents and children were informed about the study and parents signed an informed consent, regarding the possibility that the clinical data would be used in anonymous form for scientific purposes, while the entire database would be visible only to the local neurologists’ staff, without permission for public access.

Statistical analysis

Analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0 (IBM Corp., 2011, Armonk, NY: http://www.spss.com). Demographic data, headache frequency, headache-related disability, were summarized using means and standard deviation, taking into consideration migraine subgroups. The allodynia and pericranial tenderness were compared among migraine groups by means of the Chi-square test and ANOVA test. Separate linear regression models were used to evaluate if allodynia and pericranial tenderness total score were correlated to headache-related disability and quality of life, and in a separate analysis to other clinical features as anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing and sleep disorders, with the frequency of migraine as covariate. A value of alpha 0.008 was used for the regression analysis to adjust for multiple comparisons. All tests were two-tailed.

To evaluate the effect of JFM comorbidity on disability indices and other clinical variables as anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing and sleep disorders, a MANOVA analysis with JFM comorbidity as factor was initially designed. Considering the low number of JFM patients, the clinical features of patients with JFM were summarized using mean and standard deviations and compared with those of patients without fibromyalgia by means of one-way ANOVA analysis.

Results

Among 225 children with headache who approached our Center, 20 received a diagnosis of probable migraine, 25 was diagnosed as tension type headache patients, 25 did not complete the diaries of headache and or/allodynia questionnaires and four were lost to the first visit. We finally selected 151 migraine patients (Fig. 1; Table 1).
Table 1

Mean (M) and Standard Deviations (SD) of demographic and clinical features of migraine patients

 

Sex

 

Age (years)

Migraine onset (months)

Frequency of headache (days/migraine /month)

PedMIDAS

MIGRAINE

WITHOUT AURA

(MA)

Cod 1.1

(43 males. 49 females)

males 43

females

49

 

M 10.87

SD 2.91

(10.3–11.5)

M 12.2

SD 3.4

(4–17)

M 6.7

SD 2.3

(3–13)

M 12.64

SD 12.92

(0.8–32.2)

CHRONIC MIGRAINE

(CM)

Cod 1.3

(20 males. 27 females)

males 20

females

27

 

M 10.98

SD 2.96

(10.1–11.8)

M 10.2

SD 6.1

(5–15)

M 17.7

SD 2.5

(16–30)

M 23

SD 21

(17–30.1)

MIGRAINE WITH AURA

(MWA)

Cod. 1.2.1

(3 males. 9 females)

males

3

females

9

 

M 11.75

SD 3.11

(9.8–13.5)

M 11.2

SD 4.5

(6–14)

M 2.3

SD 2.1

(1–6)

M 16.25

SD 27.47

(0.8–30)

Chi square

p

2.07

n.s.

ANOVA

P

Bonferroni

F 0.47

n.s.

F 1.23

n.s.

F = 5.29

0.006

CM vs MWA – MA p < 0.01

F = 6.13

0.003

CM vs MA and MWA p < 0.05

PedMIDAS Pediatric Migraine Disability Scale

According to the headache diagnosis (class). In the first columns. The results of the chi square test are reported. in the remainder. The ANOVA test with group as factor and post-hoc Bonferroni test are showed. The 95% Confidence Intervals are reported in brackets

Demographic and clinical characteristics of migraine patients. Patients with Chronic Migraine (CM), Migraine without Aura (MA) and Migraine with Aura (MWA) were similar in age. In the three groups, females prevailed though not significantly. (chi square 2.07, n.s.) (Table 1). The frequency of headache was similar between MWA and MA groups, though slightly higher in the latter group, and obviously increased in the CM group (Table 1). Migraine disability prevailed in chronic migraine children, as compared to the other groups (Table 1).

Symptoms of central sensitization in migraine groups- Pericranial tenderness-The most of migraine children presented with signs of pericranial tenderness. In fact, it was present on average in the 68.38% of migraine patients (66 MA, 30 CM and 10 MWA, chi square 1.43, n.s.) . The intensity of muscle pain was significantly increased in the CM group (Fig. 2). The TTS score was not associated to the disability of migraine and to the quality of life. (Table 2 a), but was significantly related to reduced sleep duration (Table 2 b).
Fig. 2

Mean and Standard Deviations of symptoms of central sensitization (TTS, Total Tenderness Score) in migraine children. Divided Into headache diagnosis groups (MA Migraine Without Aura, MWA Migraine With Aura, CM Chronic Migraine. For TTS ANOVA test with group as factor: F 4.09, p < 0.0009; for allodynia F 0.95 n.s. The results of Bonferroni test are reported: CM vs MA and MWA * p < 0.05

Table 2

Linear regression analysis between Total Tenderness Score (TTS) score and a) pediatric Migraine Disability (PedMIDAS),Total Pediatric Quality of life-Patient (PedQL-T), Physical Pediatric Quality of life-Patient (Ped-QLPHY), Psychic Pediatric Quality of life-patient (Ped-QLQPSY), Total Pediatric Quality of life-Parent (PedPa QL-T), Physical Pediatric Quality of life-Parent (PedPar-QLPHY), Psychic Pediatric Quality of life-parent (PedPar-QLQPSY) b) total Self-Administration Scales for Youths and Adolescents-Anxiety (SAFAA-T), Total Self-Administration Scales for Youths and Adolescents-Depression (SAFAD-T), SDSC (Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children), total time of sleep (SDSC-tt), Total Pain Catastrophizing (PCS-S). (df: degree of freedom)

a

R2

Standard deviation estimation error

Sum of squares

df

F

Sig.

 

0.06

17.36

Regression 2316.96

7

1.10

0.211

 
  

Residual 37,653.81

143

   
  

Total

39,970.77

150

   

Model

 

t

Sig.

95% CI

Beta

Low

High

 

PedMIDAS

−0.11

−1.12

0.26

−0.06

0.02

PQL_ado_TOT

0.59

1.79

0.08

−0.03

0.52

PQL_ado_Fis

−0.24

−1.29

0.20

−0.21

0.04

PQL_ado_PsSc

−0.49

−2.06

0.04

−0.33

−0.01

PQL_gen_TOT

−0.03

−0.10

0.92

−0.25

0.23

PQL_gen_Fis

0.04

0.16

0.88

−0.13

0.15

PQL_gen_PsSc

−0.01

−0.05

0.96

−0.14

0.13

b

R2

Standard deviation Estimation Error

df

Sum of squares

F

Sig.

0.02

16.67

Regression 5

380.74

1.37

0.11

  

Reisidual 145.00

277.98

  
  

Total 150.00

   

Model

     

Beta

T

Sig.

95% CI

   

Low

High

SAFA_A-TOT

−0.02

−0.12

0.91

−0.15

0.13

SAFAD_TOT

−0.06

−0.43

0.67

−0.18

0.11

SDSC_TOT

−0.06

−0.68

0.50

−0.16

0.08

SDSC_tt

0.18

2.1

0.048

0.00

2.28

PCS-S

0.15

1.53

0.13

−0.02

0.14

Allodynia- Among the 12 symptoms reported in the allodynia questionnaires for adult patients, according to Lipton et al. [10] the items which were considered available by mothers varied from 6 to 11 (7.65 + 2). The items of 100% use were to comb your hair, to wear tight clothing, taking a shower, resting your face or head on the pillow, exposure to heat, exposure to cold.

Almost all patients reported allodynia (146 among 151). The prevalence of allodynic patients was relevant in all migraine groups, though in reduced proportion in MWA patients (90 MA patients, 45 CM, 10 MWA, chi-square 9.022 p 0.001). The severity of allodynia was similar among groups, considering both diagnosis and frequency of migraine (Fig. 2). Linear regression analysis showed a significant relationship between allodynia severity and the sum of the scores of quality of life and headache disability, despite no single score reached a statistical significant association. (Table 3 a). The total of clinical symptoms, as anxiety, depression, sleep quality and quantity and pain catastrophizing, showed to be significantly related to allodynia severity. Higher anxiety and pain catastrophizing scores were significantly associated to more severe allodynia (Table 3 b).
Table 3

Linear regression analysis between number of allodynia symptoms and a) pediatric Migraine Disability (PedMIDAS),Total Pediatric Quality of life-Patient (PedQL-T), Physical Pediatric Quality of life-Patient (Ped-QLPHY), Psychic Pediatric Quality of life-patient (Ped-QLQPSY), Total Pediatric Quality of life-Parent (PedPa QL-T), Physical Pediatric Quality of life-Parent (PedPar-QLPHY), Psychic Pediatric Quality of life-parent (PedPar-QLQPSY) b) total Self-Administration Scales for Youths and Adolescents-Anxiety (SAFAA-T), Total Self-Administration Scales for Youths and Adolescents-Depression (SAFAD-T), SDSC (Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children), total time of sleep (SDSC-tt), Total Pain Catastrophizing (PCS-S). (df: degree of freedom)

a

R2

Standard deviation estimation error

Sum of squares

df

F

Sig.

 

0.10

5.56

Regression 675.472

7.00

3.12

0.004

 
  

Residual 4149.138

143

   
  

Total 4824.609

150

   

Model

 

t

Sig.

95% CI

Beta

Low

High

 

PedMIDAS

−0.07

−0.78

0.43

−0.02

0.01

PQL_ado_TOT

−0.56

−1.85

0.07

−0.17

0.01

PQL_ado_Fis

−0.05

−0.31

0.76

−0.05

0.03

PQL_ado_PsSc

0.40

1.79

0.08

0.00

0.10

PQL_gen_TOT

0.19

0.57

0.57

−0.05

0.10

PQL_gen_Fis

−0.22

−1.01

0.31

−0.06

0.02

PQL_gen_PsSc

−0.13

−0.68

0.50

−0.06

0.03

b

0.09

5.71

Regression 589.37

5

3.61

0.004

 
  

Residual 4082.23

145

   
  

Total 4671.60

150

   

Model

 

t

Sig.

95% CI

Beta

Low

High

 

SAFAA_ T

0.50

3.70

0.001

0.04

0.14

SAFAD_T

−0.35

1.29

0.20

−0.11

−0.01

SDSC

−0.03

−0.31

0.75

−0.04

0.03

SDC-tt

0.07

0.80

0.43

−0.23

0.53

PCS-S

0.11

2.59

0.01

−0.01

0.04

Comorbidity for Juvenile Fibromyalgia Five migraine patients fulfilled the criteria for JFM (0.03%). They were similar in age to the remainder of patients, but presented with higher allodynia scores, more severe pericranial tenderness, higher depression score, while sleep disturbances and pain catastrophizing were not significantly increased in FM patients. (Table 4). Patients with JFM presented with poor quality of life, for both physical and psychical functions, as compared to the other migraine patients (Fig. 3).
Table 4

Juvenile Fibromyalgia (JFM) comorbidity in young migraine

 

Age

Frequency

Ped MIDAS

TTS

ALL

SAFAA-T

SAFAA-D

SDSC

SDSC-tt

PCS-S

JFM

3 M

2 F

M 10.9

SD 2.9

(9.9–15)

M 18.1

SD 4.5

(15–29)

M 28.6

SD 18

(5–40)

M 11.8

SD 4.3

(4–15)

M 3.2

SD 1.3

(2.2–5.9)

M 59.8

SD 7.3

(47–73)

M 57.4

SD14.4

(49–70)

M 67.2

SD 17.6

(38–56)

M 2.3

SD 0.5

(1.3–3)

M 20.1

SD 17.7

(5–32)

No JFM

63 M

83 F

M11

SD3.3

(10.7–13.3)

M 6.5

SD 5.6

(2–14)

M 18.8

SD 20.1

(12–20)

M 4.9

SD 4.9

(4–6)

M 2.5

SD 1.6

(2.2–2.8)

M 55.1

SD 11.6

(52–57)

M 52.4

SD 9.9

(50–53)

M 55.8

SD 11.4

(37–40)

M 2.1

SD 0.8

(2–2.3)

M 17.4

SD 11.1

(18–23)

ANOVA

F

P

0.18

n.s.

8.56

0.0003

F 6.22

0.014

F = 5.72

0.004

F = 3.36

0.037

F = 2.35

n.s.

F = 8.49

0.0003

F = 2.31

n.s.

F = 2.32

n.s.

F = 1.81

n.s.

Mean (M) and Standard Deviations (SD) of demographic and clinical features are reported. The 95% Confidence Intervals are indicated in bracket. Frequency of headache considered the average number of days with headache in a month. Computed over 3 months. Pediatric Migraine Disability (PedMIDAS). Total Tenderness score (TTS). number of allodynia symptoms (ALL). Total Self-Administration Scales for Youths and Adolescents-Anxiety (SAFAA-Tot). Total Self-Administration Scales for Youths and Adolescents-Depression (SAFAD-T). Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC). total time of sleep (SDSC-tt). Total Pain Catastrophizing (PCS-S) are shown. The ANOVA test with group as factor is presented

Fig. 3

Quality of life In Juvenile Fibromyalgia (JFM) patients. Total Pediatric Quality of life-Patient (PedQL-T). Physical Pediatric Quality of life-Patient (Ped-QLPHY) . Psychic Pediatric Quality of life-patient (Ped-QLQPSY). Total Pediatric Quality of life-Parent (PedPa QL-T). Physical Pediatric Quality of life-Parent (PedPar-QLPHY) . Psychic Pediatric Quality of life-parent (PedPar-QLQPSY). ANOVA test with group as factor: PedQL-T, F 4.39, p 0.014; Ped-QLPHY, F 3.76, p 0.026; Ped-QLQPSY, F 3,66, p 0.028; PedPa QL-T, F 4.74, p 0.01; PedPar-QLPHY, F 4.47 p 0.013; PedPar-QLQPSY F 3.33, p 0.038

Discussion

The present results confirmed high frequency of pericranial tenderness and allodynia in a population of children with migraine selected in a tertiary headache center. While pericranial tenderness was prevalently present in the chronic migraine, allodynia was present also in children with episodic headaches, associated with the globality of disability scores, anxiety and pain catastrophizing. Few children presented with comorbidity for JFM, though these patients were characterized by a very disabling disease. In the next paragraphs, the single results are commented.

Clinical characteristics of migraine

We found a large group of young patients with CM among the included cases (31, 1%). This group seemed larger if compared to studies conducted in adults with chronic migraine, recruited in the same center [8]. In the general population, the prevalence of CM in children and adolescent could be regarded as roughly 1.5–1.8%, not dissimilar from the adult population, though with a tendency to increase after the 12 years [33]. We can suppose that in childhood age, the approach to the tertiary Headache Centers is specially requested for severe migraine, a hypothesis that may be confirmed by the high scores of migraine disability reported by these patients. These data seem worthy of confirmation in larger samples. Another observation, which may emerge from these data, regards the equilibrium between sexes in the observed population, which confirms the results of epidemiological studies in prepubertal children [3436]. As expected, the disability linked with migraine prevailed in the CM group. In general, in patients with recurrent migraine, 8 days are lost at school because of headache, where the most bothersome features seem to be the intensity and the duration of the headache. For these reasons, school absence is expected to be prominent in the CM patients [37].

Symptoms of central sensitization in migraine and correlation with clinical and psychopathological features –Pericranial tenderness

The most of migraine patients presented pericranial tenderness, independently of the type of migraine, in accord with previous studies [15]. The intensity of pericranial muscle pain was significantly higher in patients with chronic migraine as compared to those with episodic migraine. The comparison among the different groups of headache frequency, showed also a significant reduction in patients with rare attacks. Pericranial tenderness may be caused by hyperalgesia, for the persistence of central sensitization between the migraine attacks. The close relation between an increase in pain perception and chronic headache, observed in adults with primary headache forms [12], may be confirmed also in children migraine. The correlation between pericranial tenderness and short sleep duration, confirmed what we previously observed in adults, that the loss of sleep could facilitate central sensitization [8]. Children who suffer from headache have usually a high rate of sleep difficulties, including insufficient sleep time, frequently caused by nocturnal migraine onset [38, 39]. The presence of a self-sustained circuit of sleep reduction, central sensitization and possible evolution into chronic migraine [8], might be supposed even in juvenile age. The linear regression analysis, where the effect of the headache frequency was subtracted, indicated that pericranial tenderness is not an independent factor of disability; rather it may be a consequence of the chronic headache.

Allodynia

In the most of migraine attacks, children presented allodynia. Its prevalence among migraine patients was even higher than that reported in previous studies, which were based on a retrospective evaluation by a simplified questionnaire [14], very similar to that used in the present study. The prevalence of allodynia in adults approaches the 70% in large migraine populations, selected by mailing questionnaires [10]. In our previous study in a large population of adults with primary headache forms, in whom allodynia was evaluated on the basis of 3 months observation, its frequency reached the 91% [8], so the longitudinal observation may be more sensitive than the retrospective assessment in detecting symptoms associated to migraine attack. The six items selected by children to describe allodynia during acute migraine, are similar to those proposed by Raieli et al. [14]. The questionnaire [9, 10] was easily and diligently compiled with the support of parents, based on children symptoms, so it might be proposed in the routine assessment of childhood migraine. The presence of allodynia seemed reduced in patients with migraine with aura, though this was a too small group to be considered for conclusions. A sample enlargement seems thus mandatory in order to confirm these data. In fact, in adult patients reporting aura symptoms, allodynia is more frequent than in those without aura [10], so, in our opinion, this finding is an effect of the reduced number of patients rather than be a feature of juvenile migraine with aura. Allodynia may be confirmed as a common symptom in childhood migraine, present in the most of episodic and chronic patients. The average number of reported allodynia symptoms appeared similar to that described in adult migraine [8], though it was computed on a reduced number of available items. In adults with primary headache forms, the number of allodynia symptoms seemed similar between episodic and chronic migraine [8], a finding that may be confirmed also in children. The utility of allodynia questionnaire in the routine assessment of children with migraine may be also suggested by its association with the disability scores. In fact, despite we did not find any significant association between allodynia and the single scores of the pediatric MIDAS or the quality of life scale, the globality of these tests appeared to be significantly correlated with the allodynia severity. Allodynia severity, in terms of symptoms number and intensity, appeared to be similar among patients with chronic and episodic migraine, at least in those patients with the form without aura. This might suggest that allodynia would be a cause of disability of each single migraine attack, worsening its evolution and hampering child’s ability in daily activities. The number of allodynia symptoms reported on average in the migraine attacks, appeared significantly correlated to anxiety, which would enhance the sensitivity to pain and would reduce the threshold of central sensitization phenomenon. In a recent study performed in a large cohort of adults suffering from primary headaches [8], allodynia was correlated with anxiety and depression in patients with migraine and tenson type headaches, both chronic and episodic. There is evidence that psychopathological factors may facilitate the development of allodynia for the failure of the descendant control for to pain modulation [40]. Child migraine is frequently associated with anxiety and depression [41]. However, anxiety, more than depression, would be predictive of the long-term migraine persistence and the headache-related disability [4244], for a probable linkage to the phenomena which might facilitate central sensitization. Pain catastrophizing [31] appeared relevant in patients with severe allodynia, as might be expected for its association with high pain perception… Catastrophizing of pain was rarely assessed in children migraine, but its possible role in the facilitation of central sensitization [45, 46] could indicate it as a useful parameter for clinical assessment [47]. The globality of the scores referring to anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing and sleep was also associated to severe allodynia, though an enlargement of cases series might probable enable significant correlations with the single scores.

Juvenile fibromyalgia comorbidity in migraine children

Few children among our migraine population presented comorbidity for JFM. At the best of our knowledge, this is the first study assessing this comorbidity in children with migraine and its low frequency in respect to adult migraine [2, 8, 24, 25]. Juvenile Fibromyalgia is currently emerging as an invalidating disease, even in developmental age [1921]. Although it appears a less common condition than in adults, chronic widespread pain is a well-documented phenomenon in youth, with studies showing prevalence rates ranging from two to 6% of school-age children [48]. The five children affected by JFM, showed a clinical picture of particular severity, with relevant psychopathological traits, especially depression, remarkable presence of pericranial tenderness and allodynia, and further reduction of quality of life as compared to the other migraine children. In accord with adult populations [8, 24, 25], also the patients with JFM suffered from chronic migraine, confirming that a general facilitation of central sensitization could explain a clinical phenotype characterized by chronic headache and diffuse skeletal pain [2]. Anxiety, sleep disturbances and pain catastrophizing, seemed not to prevail in this migraine subgroup, though these aspects would deserve further assessment in larger cohorts of .migraine patients. In a longitudinal study of adolescents with JFM, followed till the early adulthood, it was found that approximately in the 20th year of age, lifetime prevalence of comorbidities, including anxiety and mood disorders, approached that found in adult studies, with over 75% of cases with an anxiety disorder and at least one episode of major mood disorder (typically major depressive disorder) [49]. More cases are needed in a next future to define the impact of this comorbidity on the global burden of childhood headache. Vegetative dysfunction, joint laxity or hypermobility, sleep disorders and psychiatric tracts, are commonly described in children with JFM [21], while headache was not previously evaluated as a frequently associated condition. Despite the low frequency of JFM comorbidity among children with migraine, the severe disability presented by these young patients, could indicate the opportunity to assess the possible presence of diffuse pain at least in children with chronic migraine.

Study limitations

Despite our sample, size was quite large; the variability of clinical symptoms in developmental age would indicate the utility of group’s enlargement. An important point in studies on child’s headache is the utility of clinical follow-up, in order to confirm migraine diagnosis and the significance of symptoms of central sensitization in the natural history of the disease. Another relevant aspect to be clarified in future studies would be the frequency and influence of first degree inheritance for migraine, symptoms of central sensitization and fibromyalgia.

Conclusions

This study outlined a relevant presence of symptoms of central sensitization among children with migraine. Patients with severe allodynia and comorbidity for JFM presented with a general decline of quality of life, which would suggest the opportunity of a routine assessment of these features, in light of a better understanding of their role in the global outcome of the disease and the response to treatments. Psychiatric comorbidity seems to have a major role in central sensitization at this age, as anxiety seems to enhance allodynia during single attacks, and depression seems to favor the development of JFM, so their careful assessment and management would be of primary importance to prevent the evolution into severe disability.

Clinical implications

The majority of children with migraine are characterized by allodynia and pericranial tenderness.

The comorbidity for Juvenile Fibromyalgia is an infrequent but disabling condition.

The correlation between symptoms of central sensitization and poor quality of life supports the utility of their routine assessment in children with migraine.

Abbreviations

CM: 

Chronic migraine

JFM: 

Juvenile Fibromyalgia

MA: 

Migraine without aura

MWA: 

Migraine with aura

PCS-S: 

Total pain catastrophizing

PedMIDAS: 

Pediatric migraine disability

PedPa QL-T: 

Total pediatric quality of life-parent

PedPar-QLPHY: 

Physical pediatric quality of life-parent

PedPar-QLQPSY: 

Psychic pediatric quality of life-parent

Ped-QLPHY: 

Physical pediatric quality of life-patient

Ped-QLQPSY: 

Psychic pediatric quality of life-patient

PedQL-T: 

Total pediatric quality of life-patient

SAFAA-T: 

Total self-administration scales for youths and adolescents-anxiety

SAFAD-T: 

Total self-administration scales for youths and adolescents-depression

SDSC: 

Sleep disturbance scale for children

SDSC-tt: 

Total time of sleep

TTS: 

Total tenderness score

Declarations

Acknowledgment

The study was supported by SMBNOS Bari University funds.

Authors’ contributions

MT: study design and coordination, manuscript preparation, statistical analysis. VS: clinical data collection, manuscript editing. EV and MD: clinical data collection, data entry. MG, MS, MGFB. Pshychological assessment. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Applied Neurophysiology and Pain Unit, Basic Medical, Neuroscience and Sensory System Department, Bari Aldo Moro University, Giovanni XXIII Building, Policlinico General Hospital
(2)
Children Epilepsy and EEG Center
(3)
Psychological Pediatric Service, Bari Policlinico General Hospital

References

  1. Stewart WF, Bigal ME, Kolodner K et al (2006) Familial risk of migraine: variation by proband age at onset and headache severity. Neurology 66(3):344–348View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. de Tommaso M, Sciruicchio V (2016) Migraine and central sensitization: clinical features, main comorbidities and therapeutic perspectives. Curr Rheumatol Rev 12(2):113–126View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (2013) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 33(9):629–808View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Winner P, Hershey AD (2007) Epidemiology and diagnosis of migraine in children. Curr Pain Headache Rep 11:375–382View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Burstein R, Yarnitsky D, Goor et al (2000) An association between migraine and cutaneous allodynia. Ann Neurol 2000(47):614–624View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bigal ME, Ashina S, Burstein R, Group AMPP et al (2008) Prevalence and characteristics of allodynia in headache sufferers: a population study. Neurology 70(17):1525–1533View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Louter MA, Bosker JE, van Oosterhout WP et al (2013) Cutaneous allodynia as a predictor of migraine chronification. Brain 136:3489–3496View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. de Tommaso M, Delussi M, Vecchio E, et al. (2014) Sleep features and central sensitization symptoms in primary headache patients. J Headache Pain 26:15:64.Google Scholar
  9. Ashkenazi A, Silberstein S, Jakubowski M, et al. (2007) Improved identification of allodynic migraine patients using a questionnaire.Cephalalgia 27: 325–329.Google Scholar
  10. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Ashina S et al (2008) American Migraine Prevalence Prevention Advisory Group. Cutaneous allodynia in the migraine population. Ann Neurol 63(2):148–158View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Langermark M, Olesen J (1987) Pericranial tenderness in tension headache. a blind, controlled study. Cephalalgia 7:249–255View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Buchgreitz L, Lyngberg AC, Bendtsen L et al (2006) Frequency of headache is related to sensitization: A population study. Pain 123:19–27View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Eidlitz-Markus T, Shuper A, Gorali O, Zeharia A (2007) Migraine and cephalic cutaneous allodynia in pediatric patients. Headache 47:1219–1223View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Raieli V, Trapolino D, Giordano G et al (2015) Juvenile migraine and allodynia: results of a retrospective study. Headache 55(3):413–418View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferracini GN, Stuginsk-Barbosa J, Dach F et al (2014) A comparison pressure pain threshold in pericranial and extracephalic regions in children with migraine. Pain Med 15:702–709View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. de Tommaso M, Sciruicchio V, Ricci K et al (2016) Laser-evoked potential habituation and central sensitization symptoms in childhood migraine. Cephalalgia 36(5):463–473View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Blaauw BA, Dyb G, Hagen K, Holmen TL, et al (2014) Anxiety, depression and behavioral problems among adolescents with recurrent headache: the Young-HUNT study. J Headache Pain 13:15:38.Google Scholar
  18. Yunus MB (2015) Editorial review: an update on central sensitivity syndromes and the issues of nosology and psychobiology. Curr Rheumatol Rev 11(2):70–85View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Buskila D, Press J, Gedalia A, Klein M et al (1993) Assessment of nonarticular tenderness and prevalence of fibromyalgia in children. J Rheumatol 20(2):368–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Clark P, Burgos-Vargas R, Medina-Palma C, Lavielle P, Marina FF (1998) Prevalence of fibromyalgia in children: a clinical study of Mexican children. J Rheumatol 25(10):2009–2014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kashikar-Zuck S, King C, Ting TV, Arnold LM (2016) Juvenile Fibromyalgia: Different from the Adult Chronic Pain Syndrome? Curr Rheumatol Rep 18(4):19View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA et al (2010) The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 62:600–610View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ting TV, Barnett K, Lynch-Jordan A, Whitacre C, Henrickson M, Kashikar-Zuck S (2016) 2010 American College of Rheumatology adult fibromyalgia criteria for use in an adolescent female population with juvenile fibromyalgia. J Pediatr 169:181–187View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. de Tommaso M (2012) Prevalence, clinical features and potential therapies for fibromyalgia in primary headaches. Expert Rev Neurother 12(3):287–295View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. de Tommaso M, Federici A, Serpino C et al (2011) Clinical features of headache patients with fibromyalgia comorbidity. J Headache Pain 12(6):629–638View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. D’Amico D, Grazzi L, Usai S et al (2003) Use of the Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire in children and adolescents with headache: An Italian pilot study. Headache 43:767–773View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Trapanotto M, Giorgino D, Zulian F, Benini F, Varni JW (2009) The Italian version of the PedsQL in children with rheumatic diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol 27(2):373–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cianchetti, C., & Sannio Fancello, G. (2001) Scale psichiatriche di autosomministrazione per fanciulli e adolescenti (SAFA)[Psychiatric self-administration scales for youths and adolescents (SAFA)]. Firenze: Giunti O.S.Google Scholar
  29. Franzoni E, Monti M, Pellicciari A et al (2009) SAFA: A new measure to evaluate psychiatric symptoms detected in a sample of children and adolescents affected by eating disorders. Correlations with risk factors. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 5:207–214View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Bruni O, Salvatori O, Guidetti V et al (1996) The sleep disturbance scale for children (SDSC). Construction and validation of an instrument to evaluate sleep disturbances in childhood and adolescence. J Sleep Res 5:251–261View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Crombez G, Bijttebier P, Eccleston C, Mascagni T et al (2003) The child version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS-C): a preliminary validation. Pain 104:639–646View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sullivan MJ, Thorn B, Haythornthwaite JA et al (2001) Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain. Clin J Pain 17:52–64View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Özge A, Yalin OÖ (2016) Chronic migraine in children and adolescents. Curr Pain Headache Rep 20(2):14View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Goldstein M, Chen TC (1982) The epidemiology of disabling headache. Adv Neurol 33:377–390PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Waters WE, O'Connor PJ (1971) Epidemiology of headache and migraine in women. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 34(2):148–153View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Borsook D, Erpelding N, Lebel A et al (2014) Sex and the migraine brain. Neurobiol Dis 68:200–214View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Aytaçoğlu H, Özge A, Köstekçi İ, Taşdelen B, Öksüz B, Toros F (2011) The Effects of daily variables on primary headache disorders in high-school children; a proposal for a cut-off value for study/leisure time regarding headache types. J Neurol Sci Turk 29:453–464Google Scholar
  38. Miller VA, Palermo TM, Powers SW et al (2003) Migraine headaches and sleep disturbances in children. Headache 43:362–368View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Bellini B, Arruda M, Cescut A, et al. (2013) Headache and comorbidity in children and adolescents. J Headache Pain. 24;14:79.Google Scholar
  40. Schwedt TJ, Larson-Prior L, Coalson RS (2014) Allodynia and Descending Pain Modulation in Migraine: A Resting State Functional Connectivity Analysis. Pain Med 15(1):154–165View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Cahill CM, Cannon M (2005) The longitudinal relationship between comorbid migraine and psychiatric disorder. Cephalalgia 25:1099–1100View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Guidetti V, Galli F, Fabrizi P, Giannantoni AS, Napoli L, Bruni O, Trillo S (1998) Headache and psychiatric comorbidity: clinical aspects and outcome in a 8-year follow-up study. Cephalalgia 18:455–462View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Antonaci F, Nappi G, Galli F, Manzoni GC, Calabresi P, Costa A (2011) Migraine and psychiatric comorbidity: a review of clinical findings. J Headache Pain 12:115–125View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Lantéri-Minet M, Radat F, Chautart MH, Lucas C (2005) Anxiety and depression associated with migraine: Influence on migraine subjects’ disability and quality of life, and acute migraine management. Pain 118:319–332View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hansen MS, Wetterslev J, Pipper CB, Asghar MS, Dahl JB (2016) Is heat pain detection threshold associated with the area of secondary hyperalgesia following brief thermal sensitization? A study of healthy volunteers - design and detailed plan of analysis. BMC Anesthesiol 16(1):28View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Salomons TV, Moayedi M, Erpelding N, Davis KD (2014) A brief cognitive behavioural intervention for pain reduces secondary hyperalgesia. Pain 155(8):1446–1452View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Trautmann E, Kröner-Herwig B (2010) A randomized controlled trial of Internet-based self-help training for recurrent headache in childhood and adolescence. Behav Res Ther 48(1):28–37View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Gerloni V, Ghirardini M, Fantini F (1998) Assessment of nonarticular tenderness and prevalence of primary fibromyalgia syndrome in healthy Italian schoolchildren. Arthritis Rheum 41(9):1405Google Scholar
  49. Cunningham NR, Tran ST, Lynch-Jordan AM et al (2015) Psychiatric disorders in young adults diagnosed with juvenile fibromyalgia in adolescence. J Rheumatol 42(12):2427–2433View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017